Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 71 → 64 of 67
1 category · RankedModernLoop
88Judge labels
8First choices
15Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Interview scheduling for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ModernLoop →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business66 of 69
0%24 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market4 of 75
9%26 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 75
4%38 labels
accepted challenger
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ModernLoop for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 9% | 4 of 75 | 8% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 15% → 9%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ModernLoop held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 15% → 9%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 → 4 of 73
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 5 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 15% | 9% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 15% → 9%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 4 of 75 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ModernLoop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ModernLoop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels5
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative31 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained14 labels3
Negative17 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“My default pick: ModernLoop—if you’re a mid-market B2B company with a dedicated recruiting team and regular multi-person interview panels.” GPT-6 Luna · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“Platforms like candidate.fyi, GoodTime, and ModernLoop are specifically designed to handle complex, multi-stage panel loops” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · scale prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: ModernLoop ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market recruiting teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“Look at GoodTime or ModernLoop. ... ModernLoop wins on ease of deployment for tech teams.” Kimi K2 · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“they're overkill for a budget-conscious small company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · hard negative
“you don't need to spend thousands of dollars on enterprise-grade recruiting software like GoodTime or ModernLoop” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ModernLoop, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ModernLoop was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ModernLoop, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ModernLoop was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ModernLoop. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 87 of the 88 answers that named ModernLoop and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cal.com62
lever.co54
sapia.ai51
goodtime.io44
metaview.ai43
firsthr.app35
agiled.app32
peoplemanagingpeople.com32
intervue.io30
joveo.com27
410 of the 410 domain citations in answers naming ModernLoop came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
modernloop.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ModernLoop takes 9% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
modernloop.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ModernLoop takes 9% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “interview scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “interview scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“modernloop”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 410 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 67 · 3 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 307
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
9%
rank 4 of 75 in interview scheduling
Segment leader
20%
Calendly
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 88 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 87 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on modernloop.com
49
subdomains included
Content
26
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 17 | undated | Interview scheduling | ||
| Case study | 8 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated | Interview scheduling |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page modernloop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as ModernLoop
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ModernLoop; a claim can dispute any of them.
ModernLoop / Prelude 1
Follow ModernLoop
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ModernLoop is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ModernLoop is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the ultimate platform for automated interview scheduling
- For
- recruiting teams
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2 ReportGDPR & CCPA compliance managementISO 27001:2022 CertificateISO 27701:2019 Certificate
- Customers named
- InstacartBrexRampBenchlingDescriptTatariNextdoorLattice
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What ModernLoop's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: modernloop.com, modernloop.com/security, modernloop.com/customer-stories, modernloop.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ModernLoop's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ModernLoop, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ModernLoop by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ModernLoop is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ModernLoop, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.