Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 of 95, unchanged
SAP · 2 categories · RankedSAP Fieldglass
155Judge labels
30First choices
67Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
42% in Contingent workforce man for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 121 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 57% of its 44 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SAP Fieldglass →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business19 of 101
2%36 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market18 of 121
2%44 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 83
42%61 labels
endorsed leader
In contingent workforce man · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP Fieldglass for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 18 of 121 | 57% | 44 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 91 of 136 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP Fieldglass held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Contingent workforce man · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 18 of 111, unchanged
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 39% → 41%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
41%from 39% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 1 of 79, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce man | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 of 121, unchanged |
| Staffing agency tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 91 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP Fieldglass across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP Fieldglass across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct39 labels18
Paraphrase3 labels2
Comparative31 labels17not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels10
Scale-constrained23 labelsNone
Negative29 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative155 labels in all, every segment counted; 30 of the 47 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Specifically designed for contingent workforce management... making it ideal for global mid-market companies needing a robust, scalable solution” Mistral Small · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice
“Leading enterprise VMS for large-scale, global programs... SAP Fieldglass and Beeline often top lists for market share and features.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice
“For large enterprises with complex contingent workforce programs, SAP Fieldglass and Magnit are the leading choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice
“For large enterprises with mature contingent programs, SAP Fieldglass or Beeline remain the market leaders” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“traditional enterprise solutions (like SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, or Workday VNDLY) are usually not viable options” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise Options to Avoid (Too Expensive) ... SAP Fieldglass | $50,000-$500,000+ | Enterprise-only pricing” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative
“Over-Engineered Legacy VMS Platforms (e.g., SAP Fieldglass, Beeline)... Excessive Complexity and Costs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy solutions like SAP Fieldglass or standard Beeline Enterprise” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Fieldglass, over the 155 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Fieldglass was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Fieldglass, over the 155 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Fieldglass was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Fieldglass. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 149 of the 155 answers that named SAP Fieldglass and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hrtechsaas.com65
gitnux.org57
worldmetrics.org55
beeline.com52
peoplemanagingpeople.com48
zipdo.co46
talentdesk.io43
venn.com38
g2.com35
spendflo.com35
474 of the 474 domain citations in answers naming SAP Fieldglass came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SAP Fieldglass stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SAP Fieldglass stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“sap fieldglass”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 103 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on SAP's site (sap.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 121 in contingent workforce man
Segment leader
16%
VectorVMS
- First choices
- 30 across its categories
- Named in
- 155 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 149 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SAP Fieldglass
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Fieldglass; a claim can dispute any of them.
Fieldglass (SAP) 1
Follow SAP Fieldglass
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP Fieldglass.ShowHide
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP Fieldglass.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from SAP
- SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP BPC / SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP ECC, SAP Engagement Cloud, SAP GRC, SAP Joule, SAP Litmos and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- stands apart in the VMS market
- For
- businesses worldwide
- Price stated
- Fieldglass pricing varies based on an organization's needs. Models include annual subscriptions and consumption-based pricing. As your program scales and spend increases, unit costs typically decrease. sap.com/products/spend-management/about-fieldglass.html
- Hosting
- USEUKSAAU
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, customers
What SAP Fieldglass's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com/research/why-sap-fieldglass-is-transforming-workforce-management, sap.com/products/spend-management/about-fieldglass.html, sap.com/products/hcm/fieldglass-worker-profile-management.html, sap.com/products/technology-platform/fieldglass-solutions-joule.html, sap.com/products/spend-management/fieldglass-sandbox-environment.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Fieldglass's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Fieldglass, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP Fieldglass by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP Fieldglass is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP Fieldglass, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.