Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 69 → 18 of 95
Workday · 2 categories · RankedWorkday VNDLY
88Judge labels
6First choices
19Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Contingent workforce man for enterprise buyers
Rank 11 of 121 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Workday VNDLY →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 101
2%17 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market11 of 121
2%26 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 83
7%36 labels
accepted challenger
In contingent workforce man · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday VNDLY for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 11 of 121 | 23% | 26 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 67 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday VNDLY held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Contingent workforce man · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 11 of 111, unchanged
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 3 of 79, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce man | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 of 121, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday VNDLY across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday VNDLY across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels3
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative16 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels3
Scale-constrained12 labelsNone
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with SAP Fieldglass or VNDLY if alignment with your existing enterprise suite is a priority” GPT-6 Luna · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually Workday VNDLY” Perplexity Sonar · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice
“Beeline, SAP Fieldglass, and Workday VNDLY lead for large, complex enterprises needing deep VMS and ecosystem integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative
“for mid-market or contractor-heavy organizations, platforms like SimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY, or Deel may offer a better fit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“traditional enterprise solutions (like SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, or Workday VNDLY) are usually not viable options” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative
“Requires existing Workday ecosystem” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative
“Performance lags, limited integrations, high costs, quote-only pricing (no transparency)... Not ideal for small/mid-market.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise pricing opacity - Bundle dynamics can frustrate procurement teams seeking transparent TCO” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday VNDLY, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday VNDLY was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday VNDLY, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday VNDLY was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday VNDLY. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 88 of the 88 answers that named Workday VNDLY and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hrtechsaas.com38
worldmetrics.org36
beeline.com33
gitnux.org31
spendflo.com29
talentdesk.io27
workday.comYour site26
gestisoft.com25
peoplemanagingpeople.com25
zipdo.co25
269 of the 295 domain citations in answers naming Workday VNDLY came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Workday VNDLY stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Workday VNDLY stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“workday vndly”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 56 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Workday's site (workday.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 121 in contingent workforce man
Segment leader
16%
VectorVMS
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 88 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 88 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Workday VNDLY
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday VNDLY; a claim can dispute any of them.
VNDLY (Workday) 2VNDLY 1VNDLY/Workday 1
Follow Workday VNDLY
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday VNDLY.ShowHide
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday VNDLY.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Jouw system of record voor extern personeel.
- For
- programmateams, wervingsmanagers, leveranciers en contractors
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers
What Workday VNDLY's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/nl-nl/products/vndly-vms/overview.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/vndly-vms/partners.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/vndly-vms/why-vndly-vms.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/vndly-vms/vndly-vms-for-hr.html, workday.com/it-it/products/vndly-vms/vndly-vms-for-it.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday VNDLY's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday VNDLY, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday VNDLY by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday VNDLY is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday VNDLY, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.