Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 83 → 94 of 95
Coupa · 1 category · RankedCoupa Contingent Workforce
23Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Contingent workforce man for enterprise buyers
Rank 19 of 121 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business100 of 101
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market19 of 121
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise13 of 83
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
In contingent workforce man · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Coupa Contingent Workforce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 19 of 121 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by VectorVMS at 16% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Coupa Contingent Workforce held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Contingent workforce man · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 of 111, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 14 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce man | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 19 of 121 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Coupa Contingent Workforce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Coupa Contingent Workforce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Coupa is chosen when contingent workforce is managed as a spend category within a broader procurement / spend management strategy” Muse Glimmer 30B · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative
“Coupa Contingent Workforce and Wand excel for procurement\u2011focused spend governance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strong if you want unified procurement across contingent and permanent labor” MiniMax M2.5 · Contingent workforce man · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coupa Contingent Workforce, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coupa Contingent Workforce was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coupa Contingent Workforce, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coupa Contingent Workforce was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coupa Contingent Workforce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 23 answers that named Coupa Contingent Workforce and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hrtechsaas.com13
peoplemanagingpeople.com13
worldmetrics.org13
appsruntheworld.com9
gitnux.org9
instawork.com9
myhospitalnow.com8
softwareconnect.com8
talentdesk.io8
venn.com8
Ninety-eight of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming Coupa Contingent Workforce came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
coupa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coupa Contingent Workforce takes 0% of first choices and VectorVMS takes 16%.ShowHide
Search and answers
coupa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coupa Contingent Workforce takes 0% of first choices and VectorVMS takes 16%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contingent workforce platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “vendor management system for contingent workers”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“coupa contingent workforce”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- coupa.com shared with Coupa's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 41,319 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,440 · 659 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,509
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 27 clicks and $339 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 121 in contingent workforce man
Segment leader
16%
VectorVMS
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Coupa Contingent Workforce
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Coupa Contingent Workforce; a claim can dispute any of them.
Coupa 5
Follow Coupa Contingent Workforce
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Coupa is the company behind Coupa Contingent Workforce.ShowHide
The company
Coupa is the company behind Coupa Contingent Workforce.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Coupa
- Coupa VMS
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Information for suppliers who use Coupa Contingent Workforce (CCW).
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Coupa Contingent Workforce's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: docs.coupa.com/en/supplier-documentation/coupa-for-suppliers/the-coupa-supplier-portal-or-csp/features-and-processes-in-the-coupa-supplier-portal/coupa-contingent-workforce, docs.coupa.com/en/supplier-documentation/coupa-for-suppliers/the-coupa-supplier-portal-or-csp/features-and-processes-in-the-coupa-supplier-portal/coupa-contingent-workforce/reports, docs.coupa.com/en/supplier-documentation/coupa-for-suppliers/the-coupa-supplier-portal-or-csp/features-and-processes-in-the-coupa-supplier-portal/coupa-contingent-workforce/expenses, docs.coupa.com/en/supplier-documentation/coupa-for-suppliers/the-coupa-supplier-portal-or-csp/features-and-processes-in-the-coupa-supplier-portal/coupa-contingent-workforce/dashboard, docs.coupa.com/en/supplier-documentation/coupa-for-suppliers/the-coupa-supplier-portal-or-csp/features-and-processes-in-the-coupa-supplier-portal/coupa-contingent-workforce/timesheet. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coupa Contingent Workforce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coupa Contingent Workforce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Coupa Contingent Workforce by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Coupa Contingent Workforce is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Coupa Contingent Workforce, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.