Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 57 → 86 of 125
6 categories · RankedFiverr
133Judge labels
1First choices
70Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Contingent workforce man for enterprise buyers
Rank 100 of 102 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Fiverr →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business90 of 129
0%24 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market100 of 102
0%26 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise86 of 86
0%14 labels
criticized challenger
In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Fiverr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 100 of 102 | 50% | 26 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 22 of 121 | 27% | 15 | criticized challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 74 of 127 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 118 of 140 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 46 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 0% | 63 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Together at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Fiverr held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 77 → 91 of 93
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 77 → 76 of 76
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce man | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 22 of 121 |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 77 → 100 of 102 |
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 156 → 74 of 127 |
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 140 → 118 of 140 |
| Job advertising | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 56 → 46 of 111 |
| Mentoring software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Fiverr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Fiverr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase18 labels1
Comparative38 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative75 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative133 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Stick to large, well-established marketplaces (Upwork, Toptal, Fiverr, LinkedIn Jobs)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Skills intelligence · negative prompt · first choice
“Deel/Fiverr Business are strong if you want marketplace scale with enterprise-grade onboarding and payments” Muse Glimmer 30B · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Fiverr Enterprise is called out as "Best for enterprise-scale freelancer engagement workflows"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For creative/digital services and simplicity, Fiverr Business is a solid choice.” Mistral Small · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Fiverr ... Severe quality variability ... Fiverr's standard marketplace has the most reliability issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · negative prompt · hard negative
“If your managers use Upwork or Fiverr to hire "contractors"... you are highly exposed to worker misclassification lawsuits.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · hard negative
“Has a Trustpilot score of 2.5 out of 5 with 14,000 reviews, with lots of negative reviews mentioning poor customer support” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal talent marketpl · negative prompt · hard negative
“Fiverr, in particular, is built for quick fixed-price gigs and may have heavy IP transfer and security gaps” Mistral Small · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fiverr, over the 131 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fiverr was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fiverr, over the 131 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fiverr was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fiverr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 129 of the 131 answers that named Fiverr and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com43
upwork.com43
peoplemanagingpeople.com32
hiringmanager.net31
outsourceaccelerator.com30
awesomic.com29
fiverr.comYour site28
hr-ai-index.com28
golance.com26
cotocus.com23
285 of the 313 domain citations in answers naming Fiverr came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
fiverr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fiverr takes 0% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
fiverr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fiverr takes 0% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “talent marketplaces”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “internal talent marketplace”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 673,000 a month (“fiverr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5,075 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 748,709 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 59,274 · 4,851 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 151,214
- Paid Google search
- 289 searches its ads show for, about 38,757 clicks and $995,543 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 100 of 102 in internal talent marketpl
Segment leader
47%
Fuel50
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 131 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 129 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fiverr.com
10,009
subdomains included
Content
113
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 67 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 16 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 16 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 7 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Blog | 1 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fiverr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Fiverr
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fiverr; a claim can dispute any of them.
Fiverr Enterprise 5Fiverr Business 4
Follow Fiverr
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Fiverr is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Fiverr is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- One marketplace, millions of professional services. Browse. Buy. Done.
- For
- Clients and freelancers
- Customers named
- Vontélle Eyewear
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Fiverr's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: fiverr.com, fiverr.com/logo-maker/pricing, fiverr.com/logo-maker/ideas/tag/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fiverr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fiverr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fiverr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Fiverr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fiverr, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.