| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 9% | 4 of 121 | 40% | 48 | criticized challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 90 of 136 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce man | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 4 of 121 |
| Staffing agency tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 90 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd pick Beeline for most mid-market B2B companies because it's purpose-built for contingent workforce management” GPT-5.4 mini · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Beeline if you need best-of-breed VMS capabilities with mature program governance” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice
“SAP Fieldglass and Beeline often top lists for market share and features.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market... Start with Beeline Professional” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“legacy VMS platforms are notoriously slow and difficult to navigate... Avoid if: Your organization has fewer than 500 contingent workers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · hard negative
“traditional enterprise solutions (like SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, or Workday VNDLY) are usually not viable options” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise giants (e.g., SAP Fieldglass, Beeline) unless you have 500+ workers.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy solutions like SAP Fieldglass or standard Beeline Enterprise” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 145 of the 151 answers that named Beeline and are not a share of its labels.
415 of the 473 domain citations in answers naming Beeline came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 139 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Case study | 42 | undated | Contingent workforce man | ||
| Report or ebook | 38 | undated | Contingent workforce man | ||
| News or press | 36 | 2 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 27 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 21 | 1 | 2026-07-28 | Workforce planning, Contingent workforce man | |
| Template or tool | 8 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | undated |
As the event pages on beeline.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page beeline.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Beeline's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: beeline.com, beeline.com/solutions/joinedup/compliance, beeline.com/solutions/joinedup, beeline.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beeline's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beeline, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Beeline by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: