Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 103 → 108 of 108
SAP · 1 category · RankedSAP Ariba
22Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Recruiting CRM for enterprise buyers
Rank 105 of 111 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 100% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business114 of 114
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market105 of 111
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 78
0%14 labels
criticized challenger
In recruiting crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP Ariba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 105 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP Ariba held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruiting CRM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 78 → 102 of 108
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 → 50 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 78 → 105 of 111 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP Ariba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP Ariba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative14 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“SAP Ariba: Some users complain about: - Complex, non-intuitive interface” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Ariba, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Ariba was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Ariba, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Ariba was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Ariba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named SAP Ariba and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
procurementtactics.com9
guideflow.com8
ivalua.com8
spendflo.com7
tropicapp.io7
finance-ai-index.com5
gartner.com5
gitnux.org5
mindsprint.com5
wifitalents.com5
Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming SAP Ariba came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SAP Ariba stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SAP Ariba stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“sap ariba”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 554 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on SAP's site (sap.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 105 of 111 in Recruiting CRM
Segment leader
15%
Gem
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow SAP Ariba
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP Ariba.ShowHide
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP Ariba.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from SAP
- SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC / SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP ECC, SAP Engagement Cloud, SAP Fieldglass, SAP GRC, SAP Joule, SAP Litmos and 24 more
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Ariba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Ariba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP Ariba by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP Ariba is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP Ariba, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.