Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
SAP · 3 categories · RankedSAP Litmos
89Judge labels
4First choices
18Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Learning management syst for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 82 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SAP Litmos →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market18 of 82
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise20 of 96
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP Litmos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 2% | 18 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 11 of 61 | 0% | 19 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 32 of 92 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP Litmos held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Course authoring tools · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 18 of 76
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 19 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 18 of 82 |
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 11 of 61 |
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 32 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP Litmos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP Litmos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels2
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative22 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels2
Scale-constrained12 labelsNone
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative89 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“is Articulate Rise 360, Easygenerator, or Litmos” Llama 4 Maverick · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · first choice
“Excellent integration with SAP HR ecosystem and strong compliance tracking; user-friendly but limited customization” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Litmos | Compliance-heavy environments | Custom quote | Fast deployment, good compliance features” Kimi K2 · Learning management syst · scale prompt · alternative
“Compliance-focused with a large course library, suits mid-market B2B for quick employee upskilling” Grok 4.1 Fast · Learning management syst · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Litmos, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Litmos was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Litmos, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Litmos was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Litmos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 89 answers that named SAP Litmos and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ispring.com45
docebo.com36
learnworlds.com27
talentlms.com27
d2l.com26
goskills.com23
cypherlearning.com20
thinkific.com18
forbes.com17
g2.com17
256 of the 256 domain citations in answers naming SAP Litmos came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SAP Litmos stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SAP Litmos stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“sap litmos”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 29 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on SAP's site (sap.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 82 in course authoring tools
Segment leader
30%
Articulate 360
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 89 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 80 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SAP Litmos
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Litmos; a claim can dispute any of them.
Litmos 15Litmos (SAP Litmos) 1
Follow SAP Litmos
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP Litmos.ShowHide
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP Litmos.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from SAP
- SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP BPC / SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP ECC, SAP Engagement Cloud, SAP Fieldglass, SAP GRC, SAP Joule and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Limitless AI - Powered Learning
- For
- customers, partners, and external users
- Price stated
- Free For 14 Days; $7.50 Per Month; $3.50 Per Month sap.com/products/hcm/partners/litmos-us-lp-litmos-ai-learning-management-system-and-training-content.html
- Starting price
- 3.50 sap.com/products/hcm/partners/litmos-us-lp-litmos-ai-learning-management-system-and-training-content.html
- Free plan or trial
- Free For 14 Days sap.com/products/hcm/partners/litmos-us-lp-litmos-ai-learning-management-system-and-training-content.html
- Certifications
- EU data privacyISO 27001 (Information Security Management)SOC 1 and SOC 2 A18:C26
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What SAP Litmos's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com/products/hcm/partners/litmos-us-lp-litmos-ai-learning-management-system-and-training-content.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Litmos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Litmos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP Litmos by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP Litmos is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP Litmos, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.