Small business▲+26Since September 2026: 0% → 26%, +26 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
26%from 0% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 1 of 95
1 category · RankedVectorVMS
60Judge labels
24First choices
6Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
26% in Contingent workforce man for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 121 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of VectorVMS →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 101
26%27 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 121
16%23 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 83
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
In contingent workforce man · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named VectorVMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 16% | 1 of 121 | 4% | 23 | accepted challenger | ▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, VectorVMS moved past the floor in its one category, Contingent workforce man, +14 points to 16%.
Best category · Contingent workforce man · by segment
Mid-market▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 2% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 8 → 1 of 111
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 11 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce man | 2% | 16% | ▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 16%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 8 → 1 of 121 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated VectorVMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated VectorVMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels10
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained20 labels12
Scale-constrained9 labels2
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“VectorVMS is the most commonly recommended low-cost entry because buyers can often access the platform with no direct licensing fees” Muse Glimmer 30B · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · first choice
“Best‑in‑class for governed vendor workflows, clear supplier portal visibility, and mid‑market‑specific configuration depth.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice
“VectorVMS is frequently recommended as a strong, cost-effective choice for small to medium-sized businesses” Mistral Small · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, VectorVMS represents the strongest overall recommendation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“reviews mention lag when many users are connected and a more limited feature set” GPT-5.4 mini · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as VectorVMS, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VectorVMS was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as VectorVMS, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VectorVMS was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named VectorVMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 60 answers that named VectorVMS and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gitnux.org37
hrtechsaas.com33
worldmetrics.org30
zipdo.co28
learn.g2.com26
gestisoft.com24
spendflo.com24
ramp.com22
rfp.wiki21
g2.com20
265 of the 265 domain citations in answers naming VectorVMS came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where VectorVMS stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where VectorVMS stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contingent workforce platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “vendor management system for contingent workers”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“vectorvms”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 117 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 27 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 543
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 1 of 121 in contingent workforce man
First choices
24
across its categories
- Named in
- 60 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 60 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pixid.com
316
subdomains included
Content
33
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 23 | 9 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2025-06-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Temporary staffing vms blog
- 2026-09-16Top vms features that enhance contingent staffing blog
- 2026-09-16Business intelligence temporary staffing sector blog
- 2026-09-16Ai in recruitment temporary staffing blog
- 2026-09-16Public procurement staffing europe blog
- 2026-09-16European staffing compliance blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pixid.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as VectorVMS
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as VectorVMS; a claim can dispute any of them.
VectorVMS (now part of Pixid Group) 1
Follow VectorVMS
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VectorVMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VectorVMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for VectorVMS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where VectorVMS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name VectorVMS, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where VectorVMS is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where VectorVMS is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend VectorVMS first in Contingent workforce management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.