Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 80
Toggl · 3 categories · RankedToggl Hire
38Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Candidate assessment for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 118 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 80
4%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 118
4%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Toggl Hire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 4% | 3 of 118 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 85 of 127 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 61 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Toggl Hire held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Candidate assessment · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 3 of 115
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 2% | 5% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 3 of 118 |
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 85 of 127, unchanged |
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 71, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Toggl Hire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Toggl Hire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels2
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Toggl Hire and Evalart often stand out due to their balance of features and pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · first choice
“Transparent pricing, no hidden fees, and a free plan make it ideal for tight budgets.” Mistral Small · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · first choice
“If you only hire a few times a year, Toggl Hire's micro-packages are incredibly cheap.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative
“If you hire regularly: Toggl Hire or TestGorilla (affordable unlimited plans)” MiniMax M2.5 · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Toggl Hire, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Toggl Hire was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Toggl Hire, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Toggl Hire was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Toggl Hire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named Toggl Hire and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app20
testgorilla.com20
fitsmallbusiness.com19
chanty.com15
hiretruffle.com14
hirevire.com14
pin.com14
peoplemanagingpeople.com12
g2.com10
selectsoftwarereviews.com10
148 of the 148 domain citations in answers naming Toggl Hire came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
toggl.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Toggl Hire takes 4% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.ShowHide
Search and answers
toggl.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Toggl Hire takes 4% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pre-employment assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“toggl hire”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- toggl.com shared with Toggl's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 257,259 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,719 · 912 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 24,718
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 3 of 118 in candidate assessment
Segment leader
52%
TestGorilla
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 38 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 38 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Toggl Hire
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Toggl is the company behind Toggl Hire.ShowHide
The company
Toggl is the company behind Toggl Hire.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Toggl
- Toggl Plan, Toggl Track
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Free plan or trial
- Free 30-day trial for all features toggl.com
- Certifications
- GDPR compliance
- Customers named
- Sweat+CoNetguruXmartlabsTalkshop MediaNetconomyFullStack Labs
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Toggl Hire's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: toggl.com, toggl.com/pricing, toggl.com/product/toggl-sso, toggl.com/customers, toggl.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Toggl Hire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Toggl Hire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Toggl Hire by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Toggl Hire is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Toggl Hire, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Toggl Hire is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Toggl Hire is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideToggl Hire is among the products AI models recommend first in Candidate assessment this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.