Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 → 42 of 89
1 category · RankedBeekeeper
77Judge labels
4First choices
10Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Frontline employee apps for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 106 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Beekeeper →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 90
0%17 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market3 of 106
4%26 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 91
4%30 labels
accepted challenger
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Beekeeper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 4% | 3 of 106 | 0% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Beekeeper held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
Mid-market▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 100
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 9 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 9% | 2% | ▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 106, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Beekeeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Beekeeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels2
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative24 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained12 labels1
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Purpose-built frontline communication with strong offline capabilities and no-code workflow tools... Best for organizations with significant frontline workforce” Muse Glimmer 30B · Frontline employee apps · scale prompt · first choice
“RedeApp and Beekeeper are the top choices due to their mobile-first design” Mistral Small · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · first choice
“Beekeeper: Excellent for highly operational workforces (manufacturing, hospitality) with deep task-management, shift integration, and secure communication features.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · scale prompt · alternative
“The best apps for frontline workers include Blink, Connecteam, Beekeeper, WorkJam, and MangoApps” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Beekeeper, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beekeeper was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Beekeeper, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beekeeper was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Beekeeper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 76 of the 77 answers that named Beekeeper and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mangoapps.com61
joinblink.com49
guideflow.com44
staffbase.com39
oak.com34
hr-ai-index.com28
turnonwork.com28
agilityportal.io25
redeapp.com25
changeengine.com23
356 of the 356 domain citations in answers naming Beekeeper came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lumapps.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beekeeper takes 4% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lumapps.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beekeeper takes 4% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “frontline apps”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “frontline employee communication app”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 74,000 a month (“beekeeper”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10,293 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 26,580 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,996 · 124 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,676
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $158 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 3 of 106 in frontline employee apps
Segment leader
49%
Connecteam
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 77 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 76 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lumapps.com
3,668
subdomains included
Content
1,102
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
39 · 117
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 579 | 0 | 2026-01-28 | Employee onboarding, Internal communications | |
| News or press | 176 | undated | Internal communications | ||
| Conference or event | 86 | 0 | 2025-06-30 | ||
| Case study | 68 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 61 | 0 | 2026-03-12 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Report or ebook | 55 | undated | Internal communications | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 22 | 0 | 2021-11-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | 1 | 2026-08-29 | Internal communications | |
| Template or tool | 19 | 0 | 2023-08-29 | Employee onboarding | |
| Podcast or video | 16 | 0 | 2023-10-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-29What is a feedback loop glossary or explainer
- 2026-03-12Lumapps vs staffbase intranet comparison
- 2026-03-02Workvivo alternatives comparison
- 2026-02-05Simpplr alternatives comparison
- 2026-01-28Employee experience ownership blog
- 2025-09-035 ways to connect deskless workers in manufacturing blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- April 23, 2026Panel: Don’t Fear the Tech Stack: How to Make the Right Moves That Finally Put Your Tools to Work For YouWestin Boston Seaport, Boston, United States · spoke
- April 21, 2026 to April 23, 2026Ragan Employee Communications and Culture Conference 2026Boston, United States · attended
- March 17, 2026 to March 19, 2026UNLEASH America 2026Caesars Forum, Las Vegas, United States · exhibited
- October 29, 2025Executive Roundtable 2025Storchen Hotel, Zürich · hosted
As the event pages on lumapps.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lumapps.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Beekeeper
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Beekeeper; a claim can dispute any of them.
Beekeeper by LumApps 2Beekeeper (by LumApps) 1LumApps + Beekeeper 1
Follow Beekeeper
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beekeeper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beekeeper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Beekeeper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Beekeeper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Beekeeper, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Beekeeper is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Beekeeper is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideBeekeeper is among the products AI models recommend first in Frontline employee apps this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.