Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 66 → 77 of 89
2 categories · RankedWorkJam
50Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Frontline employee apps for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 106 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of WorkJam →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business68 of 90
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 106
0%17 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 91
2%24 labels
accepted challenger
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WorkJam for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 15 of 106 | 6% | 17 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 106 of 108 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WorkJam held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 11 → 14 of 100
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 15 of 106 |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 106 of 108, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WorkJam across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WorkJam across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative23 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Professional frontline tools (like WorkJam or Connecteam) have features that automatically block work communications when an employee is clocked out.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · negative prompt · alternative
“If you're willing to invest a bit more for comprehensive features, WorkJam offers the best value” MiniMax M2.5 · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · alternative
“The best apps for frontline workers include Blink, Connecteam, Beekeeper, WorkJam, and MangoApps” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · negative prompt · alternative
“Built explicitly for enterprise-level operational execution and retail compliance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Slow loading, no calendar export/sync, unreliable schedules, login fails.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
“It can be excessive for organizations that only need communication” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WorkJam, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkJam was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WorkJam, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkJam was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkJam. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 50 answers that named WorkJam and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mangoapps.com39
joinblink.com29
guideflow.com27
staffbase.com22
g2.com20
oak.com19
hr-ai-index.com18
changeengine.com17
turnonwork.com15
agilityportal.io13
219 of the 219 domain citations in answers naming WorkJam came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workjam.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WorkJam takes 0% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workjam.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WorkJam takes 0% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “frontline apps”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “frontline employee communication app”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 18,100 a month (“workjam”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 357 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,126 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,060 · 117 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,509
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 106 in frontline employee apps
Segment leader
49%
Connecteam
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 50 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 50 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workjam.com
2,257
subdomains included
Content
229
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
15 · 40
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 106 | undated | Earned wage access, Workforce scheduling | ||
| Conference or event | 46 | undated | |||
| Blog | 36 | undated | |||
| Case study | 15 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 7 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 17, 2026Étape de la tournée à LondresHôtel Richmond Hill, London · hosted
- September 15, 2026Étape de la tournée à DallasHôtel Swexan, Dallas · hosted
- April 23, 2026Tech Talk | 23 avril | 12:50pmExCel Londres, Londres · spoke
- April 22, 2026 to April 23, 2026Retail Technology Show - RTS | Londres | 2026ExCel Londres, Londres · exhibited
- October 20, 2025 to October 22, 2025Unleash World 2025Paris, France · spoke
As the event pages on workjam.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workjam.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow WorkJam
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WorkJam is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WorkJam is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Complete Frontline Operations Platform
- For
- frontline teams
- Price stated
- Free for 60 Days. workjam.com
- Starting price
- 0 workjam.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free for 60 Days. workjam.com
- Customers named
- AramarkMarks & SpencerAxiom GroupCalvin Klein
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What WorkJam's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workjam.com, workjam.com/products/audits, workjam.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkJam's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkJam, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorkJam by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WorkJam is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorkJam, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.