AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Onboarding and employee experience › Frontline employee apps › Beekeeper vs MangoApps
Frontline employee apps · October 2026 Edition

Beekeeper vs MangoApps

One of fourteen models named Beekeeper first on the direct prompt; zero named MangoApps. Beekeeper was named by ten of the fourteen models and MangoApps by ten and Beekeeper carries 26 labels and MangoApps 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Beekeeper

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

MangoApps

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels2621A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Beekeeper reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Connecteam was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Connecteam vs Beekeeper · Connecteam vs MangoApps · Blink vs Beekeeper

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the frontline employee apps page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BeekeeperFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMangoApps
Direct10
Paraphrase01
Comparative01
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Beekeeper and MangoApps were named in the same answer thirty-one times, of the 77 answers naming Beekeeper and the 97 naming MangoApps. In those answers MangoApps took the first choice five times and Beekeeper two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Beekeeper and MangoApps stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Beekeeper MangoApps first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Beekeeper on the left and MangoApps on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Beekeeper and MangoApps stood in it.

Beekeeper first, MangoApps not the choice

1 of 14 modelsMangoApps was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallBeekeeper, RedeApp alternatives: Blink, Sociabble

Neither was the first choice, one was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Blink alternatives: Connecteam, MangoApps, Workvivo
Gemini 3.5 FlashBlink, Connecteam alternatives: Beekeeper, Yourco, goHappy
Perplexity SonarBlink alternatives: MangoApps, Staffbase, Workvivo
Grok 4.1 FastConnecteam alternatives: Beekeeper, Blink
DeepSeek V4 FlashConnecteam alternatives: Beekeeper, Blink, Staffbase
Qwen 3.7 FlashConnecteam alternatives: MangoApps, Oak Engage, Staffbase
Kimi K2Blink, Connecteam alternatives: MangoApps, Staffbase, Workvivo
GLM 4.7 FlashXConnecteam alternatives: Beekeeper, Blink, Firstup, Staffbase, WorkJam, Workvivo
MiniMax M2.5Connecteam alternatives: Beekeeper, Blink, Sociabble
Muse Glimmer 30BConnecteam alternatives: Beekeeper, Blink

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniStaffbase alternatives: Connecteam
Llama 4 MaverickConnecteam, Staffbase
GPT-6 LunaBlink alternatives: Beekeeper/LumApps, Connecteam, Staffbase

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Beekeeper0%#7 of 10
MangoApps0%#– of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Beekeeper leads by two points.
Beekeeper4%#3 of 12
MangoApps2%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: MangoApps leads at enterprise.
MangoApps6%#3 of 11
Beekeeper4%#4 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Beekeeper

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Purpose-built frontline communication with strong offline capabilities and no-code workflow tools... Best for organizations with significant frontline workforce” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“RedeApp and Beekeeper are the top choices due to their mobile-first design” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Beekeeper: Excellent for highly operational workforces (manufacturing, hospitality) with deep task-management, shift integration, and secure communication features.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative

What the models said about MangoApps

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“MangoApps | Enterprise mixed desk + frontline workforces | Unified super app with full workflow depth” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.