| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 5% | 7 of 86 | 11% | 38 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 18 of 106 | 24% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 18 of 106 |
| Internal communications | 6% | 6% | =heldSince September 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 7 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If I had to pick one default recommendation for most mid-market B2B firms, I'd say Workvivo.” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice
“Good candidates for your size typically include Simpplr, Workvivo, MangoApps, Interact, or Igloo” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · scale prompt · first choice
“Start here if B2B tech-heavy: Simpplr or Workvivo (top G2 performers for mid-market).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want a dedicated employee communications / social intranet for culture and engagement at scale, Workvivo and similar platforms are the typical category” Muse Glimmer 30B · Internal communications · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid Staffbase and Workvivo on a tight budget” GPT-5.4 mini · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · hard negative
“No enterprise-grade frontline platforms like Blink, Staffbase, Workvivo, Simpplr offer a free tier” Muse Glimmer 30B · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · soft negative
“Can be overwhelming for small businesses; some users report slow performance and laggy messaging” Kimi K2 · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
“The noted downside is: Can be overwhelming for small businesses or non-tech savvy employees.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 163 of the 167 answers that named Workvivo and are not a share of its labels.
572 of the 666 domain citations in answers naming Workvivo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 562 | undated | Internal communications, Employee engagement surv | ||
| Case study | 51 | 0 | 2026-03-03 | ||
| Comparison | 32 | 0 | 2024-08-16 | ||
| Podcast or video | 25 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2024-01-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2024-11-04 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Every page workvivo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Workvivo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workvivo.com, workvivo.com/pricing, workvivo.com/security, workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison, workvivo.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workvivo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workvivo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workvivo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: