| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 20% | 2 of 106 | 2% | 49 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 14% → 20%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 20 of 86 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 14% | 20% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 14% → 20%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 106, unchanged |
| Internal communications | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 20 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Blink is built specifically for frontline and deskless workers... best for predominantly deskless, mid-market to enterprise organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · first choice
“If communication is your primary need: Blink delivers the highest frontline adoption rates at an affordable per-user price.” Kimi K2 · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · first choice
“Stick to agile, mobile-first platforms like Blink or Connecteam for the fastest return on investment.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · first choice
“Connecteam and Blink are frequently recommended as the best frontline employee communication apps” Mistral Small · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“no permanent free tier for the full feature set ... be aware it adds a recurring line item from day one” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 164 of the 165 answers that named Blink and are not a share of its labels.
568 of the 692 domain citations in answers naming Blink came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 87 | undated | HRIS and HCM platforms | ||
| Comparison | 52 | undated | Internal communications | ||
| Case study | 29 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 16 | undated | |||
| Blog | 11 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 11 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 10 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on joinblink.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page joinblink.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Blink's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: joinblink.com, joinblink.com/pricing, trust.joinblink.com, joinblink.com/features/chat, joinblink.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Blink's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Blink, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Blink by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Blink is among the products AI models recommend first in Frontline employee apps this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.