Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 55 → 72 of 89
1 category · RankedYOOBIC
18Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Frontline employee apps for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 106 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business74 of 90
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 106
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise16 of 91
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named YOOBIC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 17 of 106 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, YOOBIC held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 → 17 of 100
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 → 15 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 17 of 106 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated YOOBIC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated YOOBIC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Very strong on digital checklists, operational tasks, micro-learning, and communication, heavily used in retail and field services.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose MangoApps, WorkJam, or YOOBIC if you need a broader platform” Perplexity Sonar · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative
“WorkJam, YOOBIC – combine comms with shift and task management.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative
“SOP-to-task execution with photo proof and real-time visibility” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as YOOBIC, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and YOOBIC was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as YOOBIC, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and YOOBIC was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named YOOBIC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named YOOBIC and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mangoapps.com16
guideflow.com11
joinblink.com11
staffbase.com11
hr-ai-index.com9
changeengine.com8
slashdot.org8
sourceforge.net8
turnonwork.com8
g2.com7
Ninety-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming YOOBIC came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
yoobic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, YOOBIC takes 0% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
yoobic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, YOOBIC takes 0% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “frontline apps”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “frontline employee communication app”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“yoobic”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 38 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,072 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 546 · 47 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,327
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 106 in frontline employee apps
Segment leader
49%
Connecteam
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on yoobic.com
1,145
subdomains included
Content
824
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
6 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 714 | 24 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 41 | 0 | 2026-06-05 | ||
| Case study | 17 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 12 | 0 | 2026-05-22 | ||
| News or press | 12 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 7 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 2 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2023-12-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Yoobic ranked number 1 retail task management g2 fall 2026 blog
- 2026-09-24Yoobic ranks number 1 g2 fall 2026 grid reports news or press
- 2026-09-15Produce department on shelf availability blog
- 2026-09-14Retail store operations efficiency metrics blog
- 2026-09-14Gen z phygital retail customer journey blog
- 2026-09-08Retail ai copilot store data blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 16, 2026Retail Intelligence Tour Cape Town 2026InterContinental Table Bay Cape Town, Cape Town · hosted
- August 5, 2026Retail Intelligence Tour Melbourne 2026W Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia · hosted
- April 22, 2026 to April 23, 2026RTS 2026ExCeL London · exhibited
- April 22, 2026Frontline in BloomYOOBIC Booth V10 · hosted
- April 22, 2026YOOBIC Retail MixerThe Fox, ExCeL · hosted
As the event pages on yoobic.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page yoobic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as YOOBIC
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as YOOBIC; a claim can dispute any of them.
Yoobic 1
Follow YOOBIC
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
YOOBIC is its own company.ShowHide
The company
YOOBIC is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI-Powered Retail Store Operations Platform
- For
- retail operations leaders, internal comms teams, L&D and enablement, IT / digital transformation leaders
- Price stated
- priced upfront yoobic.com
- Integrations claimed
- 200 yoobic.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IICSA STAR Level 1ISO 27001ISO 27017ISO 27018ISO 27701GDPR
- Hosting
- EU
- Customers named
- Vans350+ enterprise brands350+ top global enterprisesMoschino
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial
What YOOBIC's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: yoobic.com, yoobic.com/pricing, trust.yoobic.com, yoobic.com/use-cases/onboarding, yoobic.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when YOOBIC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as YOOBIC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for YOOBIC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where YOOBIC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name YOOBIC, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.