Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 34 → 63 of 89
1 category · RankedFlip
22Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Frontline employee apps for mid-market buyers
Rank 16 of 106 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Flip →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business65 of 90
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 106
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise19 of 91
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Flip for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 16 of 106 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Flip held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 15 of 100
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 17 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 of 106, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Flip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Flip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Opt for enterprise-grade alternatives like Blink, Staffbase, or Flip” Grok 4.1 Fast · Frontline employee apps · negative prompt · first choice
“Flip mimics the design of consumer social feeds, which drives exceptionally high adoption rates” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative
“A highly secure, GDPR-compliant German-born app that functions like a corporate WhatsApp” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · scale prompt · alternative
“Employee comms and engagement first → Flip” GPT-5.4 mini · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Flip, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flip was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Flip, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flip was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Flip. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Flip and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mangoapps.com17
joinblink.com12
staffbase.com12
getflip.comYour site11
guideflow.com11
g2.com8
hr-ai-index.com8
changeengine.com7
oak.com7
agilityportal.io6
Eighty-eight of the ninety-nine domain citations in answers naming Flip came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
getflip.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Flip takes 0% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
getflip.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Flip takes 0% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “frontline apps”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “frontline employee communication app”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 246,000 a month (“flip”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 174,035 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,011 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,991 · 57 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,306
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 18 clicks and $274 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 106 in frontline employee apps
Segment leader
49%
Connecteam
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on getflip.com
717
subdomains included
Content
219
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
30 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 121 | undated | Workforce management sui, Employee onboarding | ||
| Case study | 30 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 17 | undated | |||
| News or press | 14 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 13 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 8 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 20, 2026 to October 22, 2026Unleash WorldExpo Porte de Versailles, Paris, France · exhibits
Last twelve months
- September 15, 2026 to September 17, 2026Zukunft Personal EuropeKoelnmesse, Cologne, Germany · exhibited
- September 10, 2026Workforce Innovation ExpoProtein Studios Shorditch, London, United Kingdom · exhibited
As the event pages on getflip.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page getflip.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Flip
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Flip is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Flip is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI employee experience platform for frontline and deskless workers
- For
- Enterprises with large frontline workforces across retail, manufacturing, logistics, food service, and healthcare
- Price stated
- The actual cost of an employee platform depends not only on the number of employees in your company but also on the features you want to use and the integrations you require. Instead, get in touch with us today. We'll prepare an individual quote that is based on your needs and contains precise figures. getflip.com
- Starting price
- 0 getflip.com
- Free plan or trial
- Yes. Flip supports a lightweight pilot to validate impact, reach and process fit in everyday use. getflip.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPRHIPAAISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27001 SoAISO/IEC 27017:2015ISO/IEC 27018:2019SOC 2 Type 2
- Hosting
- EU / USA / AU (per customer cluster; EU customers are hosted in Germany West Central)EUGlobalEU, USEU (Microsoft EU Data Zone)
- Customers named
- BoschREWEKFC Queensway EuropePENNYMAHLESafestoreBen & Jerry'selasto
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Flip's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: getflip.com, getflip.com/pricing, trust.getflip.com, getflip.com/platform, getflip.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Flip's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Flip, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Flip by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Flip is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Flip, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.