Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 3% in September 2026.
0%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
2 categories · Named, not rankedWellSteps
10Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. WellSteps was named 6 times in Employee wellbeing and 1 other category, where Wellable led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market23 of 111
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 67
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WellSteps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee wellbeing and mental health | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 23 of 111 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 22% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial wellness platforms | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 95 of 117 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LearnLux at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, WellSteps held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Employee wellbeing · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 31 of 106
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 16 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee wellbeing | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 23 of 111 |
| Financial wellness | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 95 of 117, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WellSteps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WellSteps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“$3/user/month | Challenges, assessments, education; focuses on ROI/health cost reduction.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative
“If you want a broader, more hands-on wellness program, compare it with WellSteps” GPT-6 Luna · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative
“Add WellSteps or Avidon Health at ~$3/month per employee.” Kimi K2 · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“pricing is custom/"contact us," so it's harder to judge budget fit upfront” GPT-5.4 mini · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WellSteps, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WellSteps was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WellSteps, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WellSteps was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WellSteps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named WellSteps and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com7
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
avidonhealth.com4
nectarhr.com4
vantagefit.io4
wellsteps.comYour site4
accio.com3
calmerry.com3
deskbreak.app3
everstage.com3
Thirty-seven of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming WellSteps came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
wellsteps.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WellSteps takes 0% of first choices and Wellable takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
wellsteps.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WellSteps takes 0% of first choices and Wellable takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “wellbeing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee wellbeing platform”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“wellsteps”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,526 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,383 · 76 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,020
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 28 clicks and $753 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 111 in employee wellbeing
Segment leader
22%
Wellable
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on wellsteps.com
119
subdomains included
Content
46
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 41 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Supporting working parents wellness benefits that actually help blog
- 2026-09-01What is a broker wellness partnership and how does it work glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-18Individualized employee wellness in the workplace blog
- 2026-08-04Hidden wellness dollars utah employers can use to invest in a wellness platform blog
- 2026-07-21Your workplace impacts wellness blog
- 2026-07-07Wellness revenue for benefits brokers blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page wellsteps.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as WellSteps
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WellSteps; a claim can dispute any of them.
Wellable/Wellsteps 1
Follow WellSteps
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WellSteps is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WellSteps is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an all-in-one corporate wellness platform
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- starting at just $0.50 per participant per month wellsteps.com/explore/solutions
- Starting price
- 0.50 wellsteps.com/explore/solutions
- Customers named
- Woodard & Curran
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What WellSteps's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: wellsteps.com, wellsteps.com/explore/solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WellSteps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WellSteps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WellSteps by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WellSteps is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WellSteps, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.