AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › VONQ · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

VONQ

12Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. VONQ was named 6 times in Job advertising and 1 other category, where JobTarget led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named VONQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Job advertising and distributionTalent acquisition0%30 of 1110%5under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23%▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Recruitment marketing and career sitesTalent acquisition0%92 of 104100%1under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, VONQ held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Job advertising · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 60 → 79 of 97
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 12 → 29 of 103
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 30 → 47 of 89

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Job advertising3%0%▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 12 → 30 of 111
Recruitment marketing0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 67 → 92 of 104

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated VONQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for International Distribution” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · direct prompt · alternative
“VONQ for global and European reach” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Job advertising · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“can lead to an overwhelming number of unqualified candidates and may not be cost-effective for all types of positions” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as VONQ, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VONQ was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Appcast11 of 123Not among the top eight
Joveo11 of 121Not among the top eight
Recruitics8 of 120Not among the top eight
PandoLogic6 of 120Not among the top eight
Beamery4 of 120Not among the top eight
Avature3 of 120Not among the top eight
Gem3 of 120Not among the top eight
Indeed3 of 120Not among the top eight
LinkedIn Jobs3 of 120Not among the top eight
Phenom3 of 120Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named VONQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named VONQ and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on vonq.com
553
subdomains included
Content
183
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog8222026-09-14Applicant tracking syste
Webinar or virtual event4822026-09-24Applicant tracking syste
News or press3012026-07-01Applicant tracking syste
Case study1722026-09-18
Report or ebook3undated
Comparison212026-07-15Applicant tracking syste
Conference or event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page vonq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow VONQ

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

VONQ is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Talent Attraction Platform
For
ATS, HCM, and CRM platforms
Price stated
Modular pricing · turn agents on as you need them vonq.com
Integrations claimed
85 vonq.com
Certifications
ISO 27001EU AI Act-readyWarden AI auditedGoogle PartnerGDPR-compliantSOC 2 (in progress)
Customers named
Abacus UmantisSmartRecruitersEmployManpowerJobylon
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What VONQ's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: vonq.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VONQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VONQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for VONQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where VONQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name VONQ, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vonq.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.