Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 74 → 13 of 97
2 categories · RankedPandoLogic
37Judge labels
3First choices
6Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Job advertising for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PandoLogic →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 102
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 111
2%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 92
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PandoLogic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 2% | 9 of 111 | 14% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 51 of 104 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PandoLogic held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Job advertising · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 68 → 9 of 103
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 11 of 89
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 9 of 111 |
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 39 → 51 of 104 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PandoLogic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PandoLogic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Strongest overall fit for mid-market ... Start with PandoLogic for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · direct prompt · first choice
“AI-driven budget allocation across 150+ job sites; CPC or CPA model” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Job advertising · direct prompt · alternative
“AI-powered programmatic platform - Good for mid-market companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Job advertising · direct prompt · alternative
“PandoLogic | AI bidding, fast setup | High-volume roles | 4.3/5” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“quote-based and geared toward higher-volume hiring, often not suiting tight budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · budget prompt · soft negative
“It may be overkill (and over-budget) for a mid-market B2B company” Kimi K2 · Job advertising · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PandoLogic, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PandoLogic was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PandoLogic, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PandoLogic was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PandoLogic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 37 answers that named PandoLogic and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com25
joveo.com23
guideflow.com22
hyring.com19
selectsoftwarereviews.com14
adway.ai12
hrtechsaas.com11
pin.com11
worldmetrics.org11
jobtarget.com10
158 of the 158 domain citations in answers naming PandoLogic came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pandologic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PandoLogic takes 2% of first choices and JobTarget takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pandologic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PandoLogic takes 2% of first choices and JobTarget takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “job advertising platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “programmatic job advertising platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“pandologic”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 431 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 365 · 6 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,263
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 111 in job advertising
Segment leader
23%
JobTarget
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 37 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 35 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pandologic.com
2,438
subdomains included
Content
533
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 435 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 23 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 17 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 17 | undated | |||
| Blog | 12 | 0 | 2021-10-27 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | undated | Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2021-10-27View all blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pandologic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as PandoLogic
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PandoLogic; a claim can dispute any of them.
Pandologic 3PandoLogic (Veritone Hire Programmatic) 1PandoLogic (Veritone Hire) 1PandoLogic (Veritone) 1PandoLogic (now part of Veritone) 1
Follow PandoLogic
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PandoLogic is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PandoLogic is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Programmatic Recruitment Software Powered by AI
- For
- recruitment teams
- Customers named
- Domino’s PizzaBartlett RoofingInterim HealthcareI.K. HofmannExpress ProsGBS WorldwideNomad HealthSouthern Illinois Healthcare
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What PandoLogic's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pandologic.com, pandologic.com/solutions, pandologic.com/ebooks/case-studies, pandologic.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PandoLogic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PandoLogic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PandoLogic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PandoLogic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PandoLogic, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.