Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 50 of 108, unchanged
LinkedIn · 3 categories · RankedLinkedIn Jobs
79Judge labels
2First choices
28Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Job advertising for small business buyers
Rank 18 of 111 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LinkedIn Jobs →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business52 of 114
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 111
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In recruiting crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LinkedIn Jobs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 2% | 18 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 22 of 111 | 38% | 26 | criticized challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 58 of 127 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LinkedIn Jobs held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruiting CRM · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 of 108, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising | 3% | 0% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 22 of 111 |
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 18 of 111, unchanged |
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 127, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LinkedIn Jobs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LinkedIn Jobs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative28 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative34 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative79 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The premium destination for professional and white-collar talent (~27.7% market share)... primary paired destinations for general hiring.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need a specialized corporate hire: Use LinkedIn to search for and message candidates directly.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · comparative prompt · first choice
“LinkedIn Jobs / Hiring Pro — best for occasional hiring and minimal upfront cost.” GPT-5.4 mini · Recruiting CRM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for: Professional, salaried, white-collar, and executive roles” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“LinkedIn (1.2/5 rating) - Arbitrary account suspensions - Data privacy concerns” Kimi K2 · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative
“While major platforms like LinkedIn and Indeed are legitimate, they have massive scale, making them prime targets for scammers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some platforms are not inherently unsafe, but they are common places for scams and deserve extra caution: - LinkedIn” Perplexity Sonar · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
“Scammers post fakes here impersonating real companies ... Stick to vetted alternatives: LinkedIn (networking strength)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Jobs, over the 79 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Jobs was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Jobs, over the 79 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Jobs was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkedIn Jobs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 79 answers that named LinkedIn Jobs and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app32
noon.ai30
pin.com25
g2.com23
linkedin.comYour site22
selectsoftwarereviews.com21
guideflow.com18
money.com18
bestjobsearchapps.com17
100hires.com15
199 of the 221 domain citations in answers naming LinkedIn Jobs came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where LinkedIn Jobs stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where LinkedIn Jobs stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 246,000 a month (“linkedin jobs”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3,334 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on LinkedIn's site (linkedin.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 111 in Recruiting CRM
Segment leader
15%
Gem
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 79 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 77 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as LinkedIn Jobs
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LinkedIn Jobs; a claim can dispute any of them.
LinkedIn 21LinkedIn Jobs / LinkedIn Job Ads 1LinkedIn Jobs/Hiring Pro 1
Follow LinkedIn Jobs
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LinkedIn is the company behind LinkedIn Jobs.ShowHide
The company
LinkedIn is the company behind LinkedIn Jobs.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from LinkedIn
- LinkedIn "Easy Apply", LinkedIn Ads, LinkedIn Assessments, LinkedIn Company Page, LinkedIn Hiring Assistant, LinkedIn Job Slots, LinkedIn Learning, LinkedIn ProFinder and 9 more
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkedIn Jobs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkedIn Jobs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LinkedIn Jobs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LinkedIn Jobs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LinkedIn Jobs, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.