AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Recruitics · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Recruitics

66Judge labels
1First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Job advertising for enterprise buyers
Rank 23 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Recruitics →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business82 of 102
0%15 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market23 of 111
0%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 92
2%26 labels
accepted challenger
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Recruitics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Job advertising and distributionTalent acquisition0%23 of 11112%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Recruitment marketing and career sitesTalent acquisition0%63 of 10440%5under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Recruitics held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Job advertising · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 90 → 78 of 97
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 → 22 of 103
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 9 of 89

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Job advertising0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 24 → 23 of 111
Recruitment marketing0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 70 → 63 of 104

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Recruitics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01113
Mistral Small01203
DeepSeek V4 Flash00314
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00213

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative18 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labels1
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Recruitics offers a lower-risk entry point that combines technology, expertise, and support in a single package” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Job advertising · budget prompt · alternative
“If you just want more applicants (SEO): Choose Recruitics to make sure you appear on Google.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“Recruitics and DirectEmployers DE Amplify are also strong alternatives” Mistral Small · Job advertising · budget prompt · alternative
“centered on data-driven recruitment marketing and media optimization” GPT-5.4 mini · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“"Public pricing transparency is limited... A subset of reviews mentions a learning curve and interface complexity for new administrators."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“May be overkill or more expensive for a true mid-market operation; positioning skews toward larger enterprises” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · direct prompt · soft negative
“built for enterprise recruitment marketing and are ill-suited for small teams with simple posting needs” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“quote-based and geared toward higher-volume hiring, often not suiting tight budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Recruitics, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Recruitics was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Appcast55 of 6623Not among the top eight
Joveo46 of 6611Not among the top eight
PandoLogic27 of 662Not among the top eight
Radancy25 of 661Not among the top eight
Adway19 of 663Not among the top eight
JobTarget14 of 665Not among the top eight
Indeed14 of 663Not among the top eight
LinkedIn Jobs13 of 661Not among the top eight
ZipRecruiter13 of 661Not among the top eight
Phenom10 of 661Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Recruitics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 66 answers that named Recruitics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com40
guideflow.com40
joveo.com39
selectsoftwarereviews.com35
hyring.com25
adway.ai24
worldmetrics.org23
softwarefinder.com22
hrtechsaas.com18
jobtarget.com18

284 of the 284 domain citations in answers naming Recruitics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/programmatic-job-advertising-software39
selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/programmatic-job-advertising-software30
hyring.com/free-hr-toolkit/hr-glossary/programmatic-job-advertising24
worldmetrics.org/best/programmatic-job-advertising-software21
g2.com/categories/programmatic-job-advertising20
softwarefinder.com/resources/programmatic-recruitment-software20
hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms18
jugglehire.com/blog/recruitment-software/recruitment-marketing-software17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

recruitics.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Recruitics takes 0% of first choices and JobTarget takes 23%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “job advertising platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “programmatic job advertising platform”
5
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“recruitics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
99,468 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,640 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,215 · 38 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,600
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
72 ads · 55 image, 15 text, 2 video · 34 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2026, as Socially Recruited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 72 in the year. 33 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 111 in job advertising
Segment leader
23%
JobTarget
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
66 answers
Its own site cited
in 62 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on recruitics.com
772
subdomains included
Content
748
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
11 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog69742026-09-15Job advertising, Applicant tracking syste
Case study1502024-12-16
Conference or event1202026-01-21
Glossary or explainer802025-03-19
Report or ebook602022-01-11
Podcast or video402025-03-11
Webinar or virtual event202020-04-09
Comparison202017-09-28
Template or tool102017-04-26
News or press102015-07-21

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on recruitics.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page recruitics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Recruitics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Recruitics is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI-powered talent acquisition platform built for what's next in hiring.
recruitics.com
For
enterprise talent teams
recruitics.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPA
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Recruitics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: recruitics.com, recruitics.com/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Recruitics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Recruitics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Recruitics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Recruitics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Recruitics, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at recruitics.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.