| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 56 of 86 | 37% | 19 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 44 of 106 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 56 of 86 |
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 44 of 106, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“A premium enterprise solution with advanced AI, deep customization, and strong branding capabilities.” Mistral Small · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Complex organizations needing robust branding and governance.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative
“Expensive; Steeper learning curve; Requires dedicated IT resources.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative
“Unily is best for customization” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some platforms (like Unily) don't publish pricing and require lengthy sales processes — a red flag for budget planning.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
“Instead of buying expensive, specialized intranet software (like Unily or Simpplr, which can cost thousands)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · soft negative
“Some platforms (Unily, LumApps) target 5,000+ employees and may be overkill or overpriced at your scale.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · scale prompt · soft negative
“These platforms can be "heavy," highly expensive, and incredibly slow to deploy.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 76 answers that named Unily and are not a share of its labels.
343 of the 366 domain citations in answers naming Unily came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 286 | 15 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 184 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Report or ebook | 133 | 12 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 91 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Case study | 59 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | ||
| Podcast or video | 19 | 4 | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 0 | 2026-05-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated |
As the event pages on unily.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page unily.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Unily's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: unily.com, unily.com/pricing, unily.com/features/indi, unily.com/customers, unily.com/about/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Unily's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Unily, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Unily by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: