Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 80 → 19 of 83
3 categories · RankedSimpplr
126Judge labels
19First choices
37Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Internal communications for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 37 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Simpplr →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business19 of 87
2%30 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market2 of 86
12%37 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 92
17%49 labels
accepted challenger
In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Simpplr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 12% | 2 of 86 | 14% | 37 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 63 of 106 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Recognition and rewards | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 68 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Simpplr held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal communications · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 83
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 24% → 18%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 24% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 87, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 10% | 12% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 2 of 86 |
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 106, unchanged |
| Recognition and rewards | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 68 of 98 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Simpplr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Simpplr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct28 labels12
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative40 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels2
Scale-constrained12 labels4
Negative22 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative126 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Simpplr: Best Overall for Turnkey, AI-Powered Employee Experience... Simpplr is widely considered the industry leader.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice
“Exceptional AI search, highly personalized employee experiences, and very easy to administer without IT support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · scale prompt · first choice
“Simpplr is consistently recognized as a leader in user satisfaction ratings across multiple analyst reports” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · first choice
“Good candidates for your size typically include Simpplr, Workvivo, MangoApps, Interact, or Igloo” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“organizations often struggle with customization restrictions. There are also reports of significant integration challenges” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
“Instead of buying expensive, specialized intranet software (like Unily or Simpplr, which can cost thousands)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · soft negative
“Strong security but heavy reliance on Salesforce licensing; customization restrictions may force workarounds” Kimi K2 · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
“No enterprise-grade frontline platforms like Blink, Staffbase, Workvivo, Simpplr offer a free tier” Muse Glimmer 30B · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Simpplr, over the 126 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Simpplr was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Simpplr, over the 126 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Simpplr was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Simpplr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 125 of the 126 answers that named Simpplr and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workvivo.com85
simpplr.comYour site83
staffbase.com63
mangoapps.com54
oak.com53
joinblink.com46
lumapps.com45
peoplemanagingpeople.com44
g2.com43
axerosolutions.com42
475 of the 558 domain citations in answers naming Simpplr came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
simpplr.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Simpplr takes 12% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
simpplr.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Simpplr takes 12% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employee intranet”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “intranet platforms”
9
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“simpplr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 56 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 195,755 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,123 · 1,400 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,247
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $1,221 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
12%
rank 2 of 86 in internal communications
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Teams
- First choices
- 19 across its categories
- Named in
- 126 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 125 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on simpplr.com
1,632
subdomains included
Content
1,390
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 754 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 139 | 2 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 138 | 1 | 2026-07-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 108 | 0 | 2025-12-02 | ||
| News or press | 106 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Report or ebook | 67 | 3 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Case study | 34 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Comparison | 33 | 2 | 2026-08-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-12-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-13Cook media global case study case study
- 2026-08-03On premise vs cloud based intranet comparison
- 2026-07-31Facebook report or ebook
- 2026-07-30Ai build vs buy comparison
- 2026-07-20Collaboration glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-15Nhs staff engagement blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page simpplr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Simpplr
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Simpplr is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Simpplr is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Employee Experience Platform
- For
- modern enterprises
- Price stated
- Get a quote simpplr.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day trials simpplr.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 200 simpplr.com/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 27001ISO 27701CSA STAR Level 1SOC 2SOC 3GDPRCCPASIG Lite
- Customers named
- NutanixCrowdstrikeSammonsCook Media GlobalPikeville Medical CenterSilicon LabsNEW CooperativeIvanti
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What Simpplr's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: simpplr.com, simpplr.com/pricing, trust.simpplr.com, simpplr.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Simpplr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Simpplr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Simpplr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Simpplr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Simpplr, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Simpplr is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Simpplr is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideSimpplr is among the products AI models recommend first in Internal communications and intranet this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.