Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 76 → 82 of 83
3 categories · RankedLumApps
85Judge labels
0First choices
24Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Internal communications for mid-market buyers
Rank 23 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LumApps →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business86 of 87
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market23 of 86
0%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise21 of 92
0%40 labels
accepted challenger
In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LumApps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 23 of 86 | 23% | 22 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 24 of 106 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Employee engagement surveys | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 47 of 58 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LumApps held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal communications · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 → 23 of 83
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 21 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 23 of 86 |
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 106, unchanged |
| Employee engagement surv | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 58, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LumApps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LumApps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative29 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative19 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative85 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“best suited for enterprise organizations that need one intranet platform to support desk-based, frontline, and hybrid employees at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative
“A Leader in Gartner's Magic Quadrant, LumApps is strong in communication-first intranets with broad integrations” Mistral Small · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative
“Great integration with Google Drive/Chat; Unified hub. | Heavily dependent on Google ecosystem.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative
“Beekeeper / LumApps: Best for frontline-heavy orgs needing strong operational communication” Muse Glimmer 30B · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Heavy dependency on Google Workspace ecosystem; potential vendor lock-in” Kimi K2 · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative
“it has been noted for having a complex backend and may require more strategic setup than plug-and-play solutions” Mistral Small · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some platforms (Unily, LumApps) target 5,000+ employees and may be overkill or overpriced at your scale.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · scale prompt · soft negative
“These platforms can be "heavy," highly expensive, and incredibly slow to deploy.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LumApps, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LumApps was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LumApps, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LumApps was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LumApps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 85 of the 85 answers that named LumApps and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workvivo.com58
simpplr.com53
lumapps.comYour site46
staffbase.com46
mangoapps.com40
joinblink.com35
oak.com33
axerosolutions.com28
agilityportal.io26
peoplemanagingpeople.com24
343 of the 389 domain citations in answers naming LumApps came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lumapps.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LumApps takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lumapps.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LumApps takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employee intranet”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “intranet platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“lumapps”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 31 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 26,580 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,996 · 124 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,676
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $158 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 86 in internal communications
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Teams
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 85 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 85 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lumapps.com
3,668
subdomains included
Content
1,102
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
39 · 117
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 579 | 0 | 2026-01-28 | Employee onboarding, Internal communications | |
| News or press | 176 | undated | Internal communications | ||
| Conference or event | 86 | 0 | 2025-06-30 | ||
| Case study | 68 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 61 | 0 | 2026-03-12 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Report or ebook | 55 | undated | Internal communications | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 22 | 0 | 2021-11-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | 1 | 2026-08-29 | Internal communications | |
| Template or tool | 19 | 0 | 2023-08-29 | Employee onboarding | |
| Podcast or video | 16 | 0 | 2023-10-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-29What is a feedback loop glossary or explainer
- 2026-03-12Lumapps vs staffbase intranet comparison
- 2026-03-02Workvivo alternatives comparison
- 2026-02-05Simpplr alternatives comparison
- 2026-01-28Employee experience ownership blog
- 2025-09-035 ways to connect deskless workers in manufacturing blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- April 23, 2026Panel: Don’t Fear the Tech Stack: How to Make the Right Moves That Finally Put Your Tools to Work For YouWestin Boston Seaport, Boston, United States · spoke
- April 21, 2026 to April 23, 2026Ragan Employee Communications and Culture Conference 2026Boston, United States · attended
- March 17, 2026 to March 19, 2026UNLEASH America 2026Caesars Forum, Las Vegas, United States · exhibited
- October 29, 2025Executive Roundtable 2025Storchen Hotel, Zürich · hosted
As the event pages on lumapps.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lumapps.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as LumApps
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LumApps; a claim can dispute any of them.
LumApps + Beekeeper 1Lumapps 1
Follow LumApps
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LumApps is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LumApps is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The leading AI Employee Hub
- For
- Internal comms, IT & digital workplace, HR & people teams, Frontline operations
- Integrations claimed
- 50 lumapps.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGDPRtrained and certified experts
- Customers named
- Genuine Parts CompanyNational Veterinary AssociatesBeekeeper
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What LumApps's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lumapps.com, trust.lumapps.com, lumapps.com/platform/security, lumapps.com/customer-stories, lumapps.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LumApps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LumApps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LumApps by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LumApps is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LumApps, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.