Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 4 → 11 of 83
2 categories · RankedHappeo
53Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Internal communications for small business buyers
Rank 19 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Happeo →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 87
2%22 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market19 of 86
0%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise23 of 92
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Happeo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 19 of 86 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−16Since September 2026: 16% → 0%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 34 of 95 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Happeo moved past the floor in one of two categories: Internal communications, −16 points to 0%. It held within the floor in the other one.
Best category · Internal communications · by segment
Mid-market▼−16Since September 2026: 16% → 0%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 16% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 → 19 of 83
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 17 → 23 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 16% | 0% | ▼−16Since September 2026: 16% → 0%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 → 19 of 86 |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 34 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Happeo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Happeo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative20 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative53 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you're on Google Workspace: Compare Google-oriented intranet products such as Happeo with other options.” GPT-6 Luna · Internal communications · scale prompt · alternative
“a reasonable mid-market option, especially if you want value and Google Workspace alignment” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for Google Workspace-Centric Teams... Happeo is the undisputed best-in-class option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative
“Google Workspace-centric orgs, collaboration-focused | Strong if you live in Google tools” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“A frequent complaint concerns limited content controls” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Happeo, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Happeo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Happeo, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Happeo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Happeo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 53 answers that named Happeo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workvivo.com35
simpplr.com33
happeo.comYour site23
oak.com23
axerosolutions.com19
g2.com19
staffbase.com19
learn.g2.com18
peoplemanagingpeople.com18
lumapps.com16
200 of the 223 domain citations in answers naming Happeo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
happeo.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Happeo takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
happeo.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Happeo takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employee intranet”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “intranet platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“happeo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 14 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,263 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,150 · 65 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,719
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 86 in internal communications
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Teams
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 53 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 51 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on happeo.com
2,329
subdomains included
Content
735
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
15 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 611 | 36 | 2026-09-25 | Internal communications, Employee onboarding | |
| Comparison | 32 | 8 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 23 | 1 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Podcast or video | 22 | 0 | 2026-01-14 | ||
| Case study | 17 | 2 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Report or ebook | 14 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 5 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2023-02-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Why you should integrate internal comms with employee advocacy blog
- 2026-09-25Happeo vs firstup how to choose 2026 comparison
- 2026-09-24Intranet platforms with integrated search and analytics how happeo works blog
- 2026-09-24Happeo vs confluence 2026 comparison
- 2026-09-24What is information chaos in the workplace and how does it affect productivity happeo glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-23What is enterprise search glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page happeo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Happeo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Happeo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Happeo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered intranet and knowledge management platform
- For
- small and medium companies
- Price stated
- See pricing happeo.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001 CertificationGDPR complianceSSO authentication
- Hosting
- Google CloudNew York, USAHelsinki, FinlandAmsterdam, The NetherlandsCluj, Romania
- Customers named
- RayonierGantNeste
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Happeo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: happeo.com, happeo.com/pricing, trust.happeo.com, happeo.com/product/pages, happeo.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Happeo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Happeo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Happeo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Happeo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Happeo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.