Small business▼−20Since September 2026: 24% → 4%, −20 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 24% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 → 9 of 83
2 categories · RankedMicrosoft SharePoint
131Judge labels
20First choices
46Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Internal communications for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 86 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 26% of its 38 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Microsoft SharePoint →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 87
7%47 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market3 of 86
11%38 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 92
17%45 labels
criticized challenger
In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Microsoft SharePoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 11% | 3 of 86 | 26% | 38 | criticized challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 68 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Microsoft SharePoint held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal communications · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 of 83, unchanged
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 19% → 14%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 10% | 8% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 86 |
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 68 of 92, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Microsoft SharePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Microsoft SharePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels8
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative25 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained31 labels9
Scale-constrained15 labels2
Negative35 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative131 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 23 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SharePoint "remains the leader in enterprise intranet platforms thanks to its exceptional versatility and deep integration with Microsoft 365 ecosystem"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Internal communications · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Microsoft SharePoint is the top choice due to its integration with Microsoft 365 and scalability.” Mistral Small · Internal communications · direct prompt · first choice
“SharePoint communication sites give you a place for company news, policies, and other updates meant for everyone.” GPT-6 Luna · Internal communications · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“SharePoint is usually the best *overall budget intranet* if you need more structure and document management” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Desktop‑only experience • Slow load times ... Poor mobile UX • One‑way communication” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative
“SharePoint-based custom intranets when your team needs a communications-led intranet rather than a document-management system, because they often require significant IT resources” Perplexity Sonar · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
“Can be difficult to make user-friendly without significant investment in design and training. Often perceived as "clunky"” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal communications · comparative prompt · soft negative
“"legacy enterprise builds" like SharePoint offer more features but can be complex and costly to customize” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal communications · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft SharePoint, over the 130 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft SharePoint was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft SharePoint, over the 130 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft SharePoint was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft SharePoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 123 of the 130 answers that named Microsoft SharePoint and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workvivo.com84
simpplr.com66
staffbase.com50
learn.g2.com49
g2.com46
axerosolutions.com45
mangoapps.com45
oak.com45
peoplemanagingpeople.com41
agilityportal.io39
510 of the 510 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft SharePoint came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
microsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Microsoft SharePoint takes 11% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
microsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Microsoft SharePoint takes 11% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employee intranet”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “intranet platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 673,000 a month (“microsoft sharepoint”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,137 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 145,358,109 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,421,769 · 793,520 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,904,433
- Paid Google search
- 56 searches its ads show for, about 705 clicks and $12,455 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
11%
rank 3 of 86 in internal communications
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Teams
- First choices
- 20 across its categories
- Named in
- 130 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 123 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on microsoft.com
10,448
subdomains included
Content
146
counted in the table below
Documentation
10
Product · Integration
1,142 · 20
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 44 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 30 | undated | |||
| News or press | 27 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 25 | 4 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 12 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-12-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28At nasa ai is helping scientists unlock discoveries hidden in decades of data news or press
- 2026-09-24Rockwell automation pairs ai with decades of shop floor know how so workers can solve glitches faster news or press
- 2026-09-24Run assert eval responsible ai agent risk discovery at runtime blog
- 2026-09-23On the issues blog
- 2026-09-22When disaster strikes ai helps responders reach people more quickly news or press
- 2026-09-21Microsoft datacenter academy helps launch tech careers news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page microsoft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Microsoft SharePoint
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft SharePoint; a claim can dispute any of them.
SharePoint 10Microsoft SharePoint / Microsoft 365 2SharePoint Online 2Legacy SharePoint / “plug‑and‑play” intranets 1Microsoft SharePoint Online 1Microsoft SharePoint Online / Viva Connections / Microsoft 365 1Microsoft SharePoint/Teams 1Microsoft Sharepoint 1Microsoft Viva / SharePoint 1SharePoint/Viva 1
Follow Microsoft SharePoint
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Microsoft SharePoint is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Microsoft SharePoint is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Free plan or trial
- Vyzkoušet zdarma microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview
- Customers named
- LenovoVIVIDG&J Pepsi-Cola BottlersVirgin MoneyE.ONMilpark Education
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Microsoft SharePoint's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview, trust.microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/solutions/ai, microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft SharePoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft SharePoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft SharePoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Microsoft SharePoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft SharePoint, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Microsoft SharePoint is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Microsoft SharePoint is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideMicrosoft SharePoint is among the products AI models recommend first in Internal communications and intranet this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.