Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 6 → 11 of 54
Toggl · 3 categories · RankedToggl Track
59Judge labels
7First choices
4Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Time and attendance for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Toggl Track →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 57
2%20 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 86
8%13 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise87 of 87
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Toggl Track for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 8% | 8 of 86 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 23 of 75 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% | |
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 54 of 121 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by VectorVMS at 16% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Toggl Track held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Time and attendance · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 5 → 6 of 77
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 54 → 76 of 76
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 10% | 9% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 8 of 86 |
| Employee monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 75, unchanged |
| Contingent workforce man | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 121, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Toggl Track across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Toggl Track across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase28 labels6
Comparative9 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative11 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Some recommended employee monitoring tools include: 1. Toggl: A time-tracking tool that allows employees to track their work hours and provides insights into productivity.” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · first choice
“Toggl Track is widely considered the most user-friendly tool on the market... Toggl Track is the easiest overlay tool to integrate.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Toggl Track - a strong choice for mid-sized companies, especially professional services firms with 50-250 employees.” Llama 4 Maverick · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Toggl Track as the primary choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Toggl Track, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Toggl Track was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Toggl Track, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Toggl Track was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Toggl Track. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 59 answers that named Toggl Track and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
forbes.com26
toggl.comYour site19
joinhomebase.com18
hubstaff.com17
bigtime.net15
g2.com15
learn.g2.com13
guideflow.com12
thedigitalprojectmanager.com11
insightful.io10
137 of the 156 domain citations in answers naming Toggl Track came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
toggl.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Toggl Track takes 8% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
toggl.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Toggl Track takes 8% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “time and attendance system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “time and attendance systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“toggl track”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 89 a month
- Its company's site
- toggl.com shared with Toggl's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 257,259 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,719 · 912 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 24,718
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 8 of 86 in time and attendance
Segment leader
12%
Clockify
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 59 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 50 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Toggl Track
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Toggl Track; a claim can dispute any of them.
Toggl 2
Follow Toggl Track
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Toggl is the company behind Toggl Track.ShowHide
The company
Toggl is the company behind Toggl Track.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Toggl
- Toggl Hire, Toggl Plan
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The best time tracker and capacity planning software
- For
- teams, freelancers, solo users, agencies & professional services teams, software & IT teams, law firms, accounting & finance teams, large organizations
- Price stated
- No credit card required; Free 30-day trial for all features; Cancel anytime toggl.com
- Starting price
- 0 toggl.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free 30-day trial for all features toggl.com
- Integrations claimed
- 100 toggl.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPR complianceISO-certifiedSOC 2 Type 1 compliant
- Customers named
- Sweat+CoNetguruXmartlabsTalkshopmediaNetconomyFullStack LabsInstinctif PartnersFuse
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Toggl Track's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: toggl.com, toggl.com/pricing, toggl.com/product/toggl-sso, toggl.com/customers, toggl.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Toggl Track's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Toggl Track, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Toggl Track by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Toggl Track is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Toggl Track, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.