AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Teramind · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Teramind

136Judge labels
15First choices
42Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
26% in Employee monitoring for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 48 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Teramind →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In employee monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Teramind for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Employee monitoringWorkforce planning and analytics4%5 of 7519%48accepted challenger
People analyticsWorkforce planning and analytics0%112 of 11475%4under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Performance managementPerformance and talent management0%83 of 85100%3under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teramind yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teramind across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501113
GPT-5.4 mini04004
Gemini 3.5 Flash12014
Perplexity Sonar01113
Grok 4.1 Fast22015
Mistral Small01203
DeepSeek V4 Flash12126
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash02226
Kimi K212126
GLM 4.7 FlashX02215
MiniMax M2.501012
GPT-6 Luna02024
Muse Glimmer 30B01012

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct29 labels10
Paraphrase16 labels1
Comparative37 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels3
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative27 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative136 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 28 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Teramind - an employee management software that tracks what people do during work hours to measure productivity and identify potential problems.” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Teramind - Best for security, compliance, and regulated industries (e.g., finance, healthcare).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee monitoring · comparative prompt · first choice
“Shortlist 3–5 Tools: From above (e.g., Teramind for security, Hubstaff for simplicity).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee monitoring · scale prompt · first choice
“If your primary worry is data theft or regulatory compliance, get Teramind.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee monitoring · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Frequently cited in controversies, including a 2024-2026 lawsuit by MindsEye (Build a Rocket Boy) employees and the IWGB union.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“Records video of user activity, keystrokes, email, and app usage; flagged as "overkill" surveillance that can damage trust” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“One of the most invasive monitoring tools available... "overkill," "invasive," and creating a "Big Brother" environment” Kimi K2 · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Hidden/stealth deployment, keystroke logging, video recording, tamper-proof installation marketed as "invisible"” Kimi K2 · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teramind, over the 136 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teramind was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Veriato31 of 1360Not among the top eight
CurrentWare22 of 1361Not among the top eight
WorkTime17 of 1365Not among the top eight
Controlio16 of 1361Not among the top eight
Monitask15 of 1362Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teramind. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 130 of the 136 answers that named Teramind and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

currentware.com72
insightful.io70
teramind.coYour site61
forbes.com55
peoplemanagingpeople.com52
employee-monitoring.net47
hubstaff.com44
learn.g2.com42
worktime.com39
business.com34

455 of the 516 domain citations in answers naming Teramind came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

teramind.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Teramind takes 4% of first choices and ActivTrak takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “employee monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“teramind”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
119 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 19,425 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,408 · 151 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,698
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 21 clicks and $518 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 60 text, 51 image, 9 video · 48 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as Teramind Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 103 in the year, 17 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 5 of 75 in employee monitoring
Segment leader
33%
ActivTrak
First choices
15 across its categories
Named in
136 answers
Its own site cited
in 130 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on teramind.co
1,188
subdomains included
Content
279
counted in the table below
Documentation
752
Product · Integration
74 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog168212026-09-24
Comparison5362026-09-21
Case study18undated
Glossary or explainer1202025-07-12
News or press12undated
Webinar or virtual event802026-01-19
Podcast or video812026-07-14

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page teramind.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Teramind

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Teramind is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Workforce Analytics & Insider Risk Platform
For
CISOs, HR, executives, security and HR teams
Free plan or trial
Start Free Trial teramind.co
Certifications
Teramind-certified implementation specialists
Customers named
Chelson GordonFortune 100 CompanyFortune 500 BankWestern ReserveVIVAMarble BoxBRMSPeak Support
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Teramind's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: teramind.co, teramind.co/platform, teramind.co/case-studies, teramind.co/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teramind's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teramind, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teramind by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Teramind is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Teramind, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teramind.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.