Clockify vs Toggl Track
Zero of fourteen models named Clockify first on the direct prompt; zero named Toggl Track. Clockify was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Toggl Track by ten and Clockify carries 28 labels and Toggl Track 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the time and attendance page.
By framing
ClockifyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsToggl Track
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Clockify and Toggl Track were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 111 answers naming Clockify and the 59 naming Toggl Track. In those answers Toggl Track took the first choice three times and Clockify five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Clockify Toggl Track first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Clockify on the left and Toggl Track on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was named
14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Clockify19%#2 of 12Toggl Track2%#8 of 12Clockify12%#1 of 15Toggl Track8%#7 of 15Clockify0%#– of 13Toggl Track0%#– of 13What the models said about Clockify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you want zero upfront cost and can manage basic payroll separately: Go with Clockify (free) + a cheap tablet or USB time clock.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“For the smallest budgets, Clockify or Connecteam would be the best starting points since they offer free tiers.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Clockify and Jibble stand out due to their free, unlimited-user plans.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Toggl Track
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Toggl Track is widely considered the most user-friendly tool on the market... Toggl Track is the easiest overlay tool to integrate.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Toggl Track - a strong choice for mid-sized companies, especially professional services firms with 50-250 employees.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Toggl Track as the primary choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.