Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 of 54, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedBigTime
11Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BigTime was named 8 times in Time and attendance, where Clockify led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 57
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 86
10%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named BigTime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 10% | 6 of 86 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | ▲+11Since September 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, BigTime held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Time and attendance · by segment
Mid-market▲+11Since September 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 29 → 3 of 77
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 0% | 11% | ▲+11Since September 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 6 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated BigTime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated BigTime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels5
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“BigTime is widely considered the strongest choice for the mid-sized tier.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend BigTime as the top choice for a mid-sized B2B company” MiniMax M2.5 · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“BigTime ⭐ Best Overall for Professional Services” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend BigTime as the top choice” Grok 4.1 Fast · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BigTime, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BigTime was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BigTime, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BigTime was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BigTime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named BigTime and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bigtime.netYour site10
forbes.com9
learn.g2.com5
thedigitalprojectmanager.com5
guideflow.com4
joinhomebase.com4
tmetric.com4
toggl.com4
trackingtime.co4
traqq.com4
Forty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming BigTime came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
bigtime.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BigTime takes 10% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
bigtime.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BigTime takes 10% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “time and attendance system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “time and attendance systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 18,100 a month (“bigtime”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 278 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 30,730 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,963 · 241 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,551
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 56 clicks and $2,221 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 6 of 86 in time and attendance
Segment leader
12%
Clockify
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on bigtime.net
951
subdomains included
Content
731
counted in the table below
Documentation
104
Product · Integration
7 · 7
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 395 | 19 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 121 | 2 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| News or press | 97 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Case study | 43 | 0 | 2025-10-16 | ||
| Comparison | 25 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 18 | 0 | 2025-03-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 14 | 0 | 2022-06-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 1 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2025-07-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-03-13 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Time tracking and invoicing software blog
- 2026-09-25Time and billing software blog
- 2026-09-21What is quote to cash glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-17Ai resource management blog
- 2026-09-17Ai project management tools blog
- 2026-09-17Ai in project management blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page bigtime.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow BigTime
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
BigTime is its own company.ShowHide
The company
BigTime is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Leading Professional Services Software
- For
- growing, single-entity firms that need: Fastest setup and adoption, Scalable PSA with minimal configuration, End-to-end services lifecycle management
- Price stated
- BigTime Essentials starts at $20 per user/month. bigtime.net/pricing
- Starting price
- 20 bigtime.net/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get a Free Demo bigtime.net
- Integrations claimed
- 2000 bigtime.net
- Certifications
- DCAASOC 2 Type 2SOC 1 Type 2
- Customers named
- Aegis Project ControlsPriority DesignsGainsightFloboticsBillenniumThe Planet GroupSmarshInspire11
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What BigTime's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bigtime.net, bigtime.net, bigtime.net/pricing, trust.bigtime.net, bigtime.net/features/services. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BigTime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BigTime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BigTime by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where BigTime is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name BigTime, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.