Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 26 of 54
1 category · Named, not rankedTimeClock Plus
5Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TimeClock Plus was named 3 times in Time and attendance, where Clockify led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 57
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market29 of 86
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TimeClock Plus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 29 of 86 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TimeClock Plus held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Time and attendance · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 74 → 30 of 77
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 74 → 29 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TimeClock Plus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TimeClock Plus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for Complex, Operations-Heavy Workforces” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TimeClock Plus, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TimeClock Plus was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TimeClock Plus, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TimeClock Plus was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TimeClock Plus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named TimeClock Plus and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
business.com3
paycor.com3
rippling.com3
selectsoftwarereviews.com3
apps365.com2
insightful.io2
paylocity.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
trackingtime.co2
agilityportal.io1
Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming TimeClock Plus came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
opentimeclock.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TimeClock Plus takes 0% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
opentimeclock.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TimeClock Plus takes 0% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “time and attendance system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “time and attendance systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“timeclock plus”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 197 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 37,557 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,434 · 276 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 630
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 86 in time and attendance
Segment leader
12%
Clockify
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 5 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 5 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on opentimeclock.com
1,883
subdomains included
Content
996
counted in the table below
Documentation
556
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 730 | undated | Time and attendance, Workforce management sui | ||
| Comparison | 102 | undated | Time and attendance | ||
| Report or ebook | 95 | 0 | 2025-10-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 45 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 24 | undated |
Most recent
- 2025-10-13Simple payroll overtime report or ebook
- 2025-10-13Simple payroll summary report or ebook
- 2025-10-13Sum jobs employees report or ebook
- 2025-10-13Tacllc payroll report or ebook
- 2025-10-13Timecard by job report or ebook
- 2025-10-13Timecards hours minutes report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page opentimeclock.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as TimeClock Plus
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TimeClock Plus; a claim can dispute any of them.
TCP Software / TimeClock Plus 1
Follow TimeClock Plus
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TimeClock Plus is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TimeClock Plus is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Free plan or trial
- Our system provides a robust free platform for those just starting out or with simplified needs. opentimeclock.com/pricing.html
- Hosting
- Amazon.com web services cloud (AWS) US East (N. Virginia) region
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, customers
What TimeClock Plus's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: opentimeclock.com, opentimeclock.com/pricing.html, opentimeclock.com/docs/blog2/basics/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TimeClock Plus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TimeClock Plus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TimeClock Plus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TimeClock Plus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TimeClock Plus, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.