Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 6%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 5 of 54
4 categories · RankedJibble
68Judge labels
17First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Time and attendance for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Jibble →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 57
8%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 86
10%17 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 87
4%9 labels
under the label threshold
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Jibble for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 10% | 4 of 86 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 4% | 7 of 75 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% | |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 14 of 78 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 36 of 95 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Jibble held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Time and attendance · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 5 of 77
Enterprise▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 → 8 of 76
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 6% | 9% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 4 of 86 |
| Employee monitoring | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 7 of 75, unchanged |
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 14 of 78 |
| Leave | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 36 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Jibble across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Jibble across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative15 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained32 labels16
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most budget-conscious businesses, Jibble offers the best combination of a genuinely free unlimited plan, robust attendance features, and a proven track record.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need zero cost and unlimited users with verification, Jibble and Clockify are the most commonly recommended.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“Overall Best Budget Pick: Jibble ... Jibble is your best choice, as it's genuinely free with unlimited users.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have a growing team and zero budget to spend on software, Jibble is the absolute best choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jibble, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jibble was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jibble, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jibble was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jibble. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 68 answers that named Jibble and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
jibble.ioYour site44
guideflow.com34
forbes.com32
peoplemanagingpeople.com28
joinhomebase.com25
firsthr.app22
timetrex.com22
fitsmallbusiness.com20
g2.com18
connecteam.com16
217 of the 261 domain citations in answers naming Jibble came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
jibble.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jibble takes 10% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
jibble.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jibble takes 10% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “time and attendance system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “time and attendance systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“jibble”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 108 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 67,211 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,593 · 348 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,671
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days
First shown June 2026, as Adcore East Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 4 of 86 in time and attendance
Segment leader
12%
Clockify
- First choices
- 17 across its categories
- Named in
- 68 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 66 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jibble.io
2,656
subdomains included
Content
599
counted in the table below
Documentation
247
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 230 | 0 | 2025-10-21 | Time and attendance, Workforce management sui | |
| News or press | 230 | 3 | 2026-08-30 | Time and attendance | |
| Template or tool | 48 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | ||
| Comparison | 44 | 7 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Case study | 41 | 0 | 2025-05-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2025-08-13 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2024-02-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Best harvest alternatives time tracking comparison
- 2026-08-31Jibble vs my hours comparison
- 2026-08-30Clockify shutting down news or press
- 2026-08-29Harvest price increase news or press
- 2026-08-28Changes clockify free pricing users impact news or press
- 2026-08-21Jibble vs hubstaff comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jibble.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Jibble
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Jibble is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Jibble is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- FREE Time Tracking Software
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Free forever jibble.io
- Starting price
- 0 jibble.io
- Free plan or trial
- free to use for unlimited users jibble.io
- Customers named
- Lambda SchoolYNABTektonikInfamous PRGuise EtiquetteAREA - Accurate Real Estate AppraisalsFrench Public AdministrationUS Logistics Technology Company
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Jibble's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jibble.io, jibble.io/case-studies, jibble.io/collections/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jibble's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jibble, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jibble by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Jibble is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jibble, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.