Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 40 of 54, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedTCP Software
13Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TCP Software was named 4 times in Time and attendance and 1 other category, where Clockify led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business51 of 57
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market26 of 86
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise70 of 87
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TCP Software for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 26 of 86 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 80 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TCP Software held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Time and attendance · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 of 77, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 52 → 57 of 76
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 86, unchanged |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 108, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TCP Software across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TCP Software across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Complex hourly workforce, multi-location scheduling, compliance-heavy: UKG or TCP Software.” GPT-5.4 mini · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best-in-class time + scheduling | Deputy, Buddy Punch, TCP (TimeClock Plus)” Kimi K2 · Time and attendance · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for Complex, Operations-Heavy Workforces” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TCP Software, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TCP Software was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TCP Software, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TCP Software was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TCP Software. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named TCP Software and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com6
guideflow.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
tcpsoftware.comYour site5
larksuite.com4
selectsoftwarereviews.com4
adp.com3
business.com3
businessnewsdaily.com3
g2.com3
Thirty-six of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming TCP Software came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tcpsoftware.com
308
subdomains included
Content
205
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
50 · 4
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 131 | 9 | 2026-09-23 | Workforce scheduling, Time and attendance | |
| Case study | 43 | 7 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 18 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2026-03-27 | Time and attendance, Workforce scheduling | |
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2025-08-20 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 2 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Buyers guide time clock hardware blog
- 2026-09-22Nelsonhall workforce management neat evaluation 2026 blog
- 2026-09-18Bayer case study
- 2026-09-18University of texas rio grand valley case study
- 2026-09-15Reedsburg police department case study
- 2026-09-04Multi location employee scheduling blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tcpsoftware.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as TCP Software
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TCP Software; a claim can dispute any of them.
TCP (TimeClock Plus) 1TCP Software / Humanity 1TCP Software / TimeClock Plus 1
Follow TCP Software
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TCP Software is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TCP Software is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Employee Scheduling and Time Tracking Software; TCP's employee scheduling, time, and attendance solutions help organizations control labor costs, stay compliant, and run their operations at scale.
- For
- organizations of all sizes and sectors; frontline teams; HR and operations leaders
- Price stated
- Essentials: $2.75 per employee/mo billed annually; Professional: Starting at $3.75 per employee/mo billed annually; Enterprise: Get a custom Quote per employee/mo billed annually tcpsoftware.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 2.75 tcpsoftware.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start a free trial; unlimited access to the Humanity Schedule Professional plan for 30 days; no contracts or credit card required tcpsoftware.com/pricing
- Certifications
- TX-RAMP Level 2 CertificationSOC 3SOC 2 type II
- Customers named
- Texas Tech UniversityMinnesota Department of CorrectionsCyprus Duty FreeFarmers Building Feed & Garden SupplyAtrium Health Carolinas Simulation CenterBlaBlaCarManassas Park Fire & Rescue
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What TCP Software's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: tcpsoftware.com, tcpsoftware.com/pricing, tcpsoftware.com/security, tcpsoftware.com/solutions/retail, tcpsoftware.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TCP Software's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TCP Software, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TCP Software by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TCP Software is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TCP Software, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.