| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll software | Core HR and payroll | 19% | 2 of 58 | 4% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▲+12Since September 2026: 4% → 17%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Benefits administration | Core HR and payroll | 18% | 2 of 67 | 14% | 50 | accepted challenger | ▲+19Since September 2026: 2% → 21%, +19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 13% | 2 of 78 | 22% | 37 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 19% → 14%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 10% | 3 of 86 | 10% | 29 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 7% | 5 of 66 | 17% | 42 | accepted challenger | ▼−13Since September 2026: 15% → 2%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 6% | 6 of 97 | 5% | 21 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HSA and FSA administrators | Compensation and total rewards | 2% | 14 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HealthEquity at 29% | |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 12 of 75 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% | |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 12 of 95 | 29% | 17 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 85 of 98 | 44% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 29 of 140 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 15 of 90 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Compt at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 25 of 108 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 17 of 87 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 24 of 114 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 76 of 85 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 33 of 93 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 41 of 108 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| PEO providers | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 27 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Justworks at 24% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benefits administration | 2% | 21% | ▲+19Since September 2026: 2% → 21%, +19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 6 → 2 of 67 |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | 15% | 2% | ▼−13Since September 2026: 15% → 2%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 5 of 66 |
| Payroll software | 4% | 17% | ▲+12Since September 2026: 4% → 17%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 2 of 58 |
| Time and attendance | 0% | 7% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 3 of 86 |
| Workforce management sui | 19% | 14% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 19% → 14%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 78 |
| HSA & FSA admin | 0% | 3% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 111, unchanged |
| Employee monitoring | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 75, unchanged |
| HR compliance | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 6 of 97 |
| Workforce scheduling | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 25 of 108 |
| Leave | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 12 of 95 |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 85 of 98 |
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 131 → 29 of 140 |
| Flexible benefits | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 15 of 90 |
| Employee onboarding | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 17 of 87 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 24 of 114 |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 51 → 76 of 85 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 93, unchanged |
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 41 of 108 |
| PEOs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 27 of 53, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 15 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 18 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 4 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 19 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 6 | 12 | 8 | 5 | 31 |
| Mistral Small | 8 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 25 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 15 | 3 | 7 | 29 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 11 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 14 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 21 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 18 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 21 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 8 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 29 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“"Our testing found that ADP Workforce Now is the best HRIS system for midsize businesses, earning a 4.0-star rating"; "Frequently positioned as the incumbent for mid-size and large companies."” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR compliance · direct prompt · first choice
“ADP leads the global Benefit Administration software market in 2024 with a 10.3% share, driven by its Workforce Now and enterprise benefits solutions.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Benefits administration · comparative prompt · first choice
“ADP Workforce Now (G2 and Forbes highlight for mid-market) ... All-in-one HCM with payroll, benefits, time/attendance, scheduling, and compliance.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce management sui · direct prompt · first choice
“ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, and Paycor are often top recommendations due to their scalability, comprehensive features, and strong support.” MiniMax M2.5 · Payroll software · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users have reported it as a "wretched experience" with ongoing problems with payroll, scheduling, and clock in/out functions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Poor customer support is the single most frequent complaint... pricing structure can be opaque with add-on fees” Claude Haiku 4.5 · HRIS and HCM platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Quote-only pricing (no transparency), among the highest base costs ... frequently cited poor customer support” Kimi K2 · Compensation management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Restrictive reporting, complex permissions/logins, limited payroll-WFM sync, and slow support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 592 of the 616 answers that named ADP Workforce Now and are not a share of its labels.
1,595 of the 1,725 domain citations in answers naming ADP Workforce Now came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ADP Workforce Now's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: adp.com/logins/adp-workforce-now.aspx, adp.com/what-we-offer/products/adp-workforce-now.aspx, adp.com/resources/demos/workforce-now-payroll-demo.aspx, uk.adp.com/what-we-offer/products/adp-time-and-workforce.aspx, adp.com/resources/midsized-enterprise/workforce-management.aspx. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ADP Workforce Now's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ADP Workforce Now, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ADP Workforce Now by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
ADP Workforce Now is among the products AI models recommend first in Payroll software this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
ADP Workforce Now is among the products AI models recommend first in Benefits administration this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
ADP Workforce Now is among the products AI models recommend first in Workforce management suites this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
ADP Workforce Now is among the products AI models recommend first in Time and attendance this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.