Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 of 67, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedTidyCal
7Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TidyCal was named 2 times in Interview scheduling and 1 other category, where Calendly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 69
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market48 of 75
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TidyCal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 48 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 50 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TidyCal held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 52 → 47 of 73
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 48 of 75 |
| Video interviewing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TidyCal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TidyCal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you are a growing small team that hates subscriptions: Buy TidyCal's Agency Lifetime Deal on AppSumo for $79.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TidyCal, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TidyCal was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TidyCal, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TidyCal was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TidyCal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named TidyCal and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
koalendar.com5
youcanbook.me5
cal.com4
hiretruffle.com4
pin.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
reddit.com3
zeeg.me3
candidate.fyi2
capterra.com2
Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming TidyCal came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tidycal.com
1,196
subdomains included
Content
55
counted in the table below
Documentation
75
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 25 | 6 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 1 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Blog | 9 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-02-23 | ||
| News or press | 4 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2025-05-19 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Package booking for same day event SOyM10 report or ebook
- 2026-09-15Make more booking types visible on website VftNfW report or ebook
- 2026-09-14Multiple bookings on same day 64SC88 report or ebook
- 2026-09-09Customise booking time 72narO report or ebook
- 2026-09-04Bulk rescheduling for multiple bookings MNSVkv report or ebook
- 2026-07-29Ability to customize fields displayed on the booking cards i jNAzQx report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tidycal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as TidyCal
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TidyCal; a claim can dispute any of them.
TidyCal (by AppSumo) 1
Follow TidyCal
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TidyCal is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TidyCal is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Simple calendar management and booking solution
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Free plan, lifetime plans with a one-time payment, and a Pro subscription. tidycal.com
- Starting price
- 0 tidycal.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free plan tidycal.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 tidycal.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting, customers
What TidyCal's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: tidycal.com, tidycal.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TidyCal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TidyCal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TidyCal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TidyCal is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TidyCal, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.