Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 28 → 44 of 67
3 categories · Named, not rankedChili Piper
22Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Chili Piper was named 7 times in Interview scheduling and 2 other categories, where Calendly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business25 of 69
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 75
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise54 of 75
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Chili Piper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 28 of 75 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 32 of 108 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 54 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Chili Piper held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 → 28 of 73
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 41 → 52 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 28 of 75 |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 32 of 108 |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 142, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Chili Piper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Chili Piper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AI routing, qualification, and instant booking for inbound candidates/leads” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · alternative
“The gold standard for inbound sales routing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“### 4. Chili Piper (Best for Automation)” MiniMax M2.5 · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · alternative
“Calendly / Chili Piper (Automation)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HR AI assistants · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chili Piper, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chili Piper was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chili Piper, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chili Piper was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chili Piper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Chili Piper and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cal.com13
peoplemanagingpeople.com8
agiled.app6
calendly.com6
learn.g2.com6
lever.co6
g2.com5
intervue.io5
joveo.com5
meetingnotes.com5
Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming Chili Piper came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
chilipiper.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chili Piper takes 0% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
chilipiper.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chili Piper takes 0% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “interview scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “interview scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,600 a month (“chili piper”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 130 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,997 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,328 · 80 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,409
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $295 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 75 in interview scheduling
Segment leader
20%
Calendly
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on chilipiper.com
886
subdomains included
Content
640
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
69 · 88
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 312 | 0 | 2022-04-01 | Workforce scheduling | |
| Podcast or video | 156 | 0 | 2024-03-05 | ||
| Case study | 60 | 0 | 2017-09-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 55 | 0 | 2025-10-22 | ||
| Comparison | 21 | 0 | 2025-11-13 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 14 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | 0 | 2023-02-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 1 | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2025-11-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09Mid market conversion benchmark roundtable webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-08Whats in new chili piper september 2026 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-28What is an ai inbound sdr glossary or explainer
- 2025-11-20Spicyops use chili piper to book meetings before during and after tradeshows and events conference or event
- 2025-11-13Ai chatbots vs traditional chatbots comparison
- 2025-10-22Ai plays to turn website visitors into customers report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page chilipiper.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Chili Piper
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Chili Piper is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Chili Piper is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Website Conversion Platform
- For
- GTM teams
- Price stated
- from 1250 chilipiper.com
- Starting price
- 1250 chilipiper.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5 chilipiper.com · 19 chilipiper.com/pricing pages disagree
- Certifications
- SSO/SAML
- Customers named
- GongMetamonday.comNavatticDagsterPandaDocFrontifyZillow
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, hosting
What Chili Piper's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: chilipiper.com, chilipiper.com/pricing, trust.chilipiper.com, chilipiper.com/products/mcp, chilipiper.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chili Piper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chili Piper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chili Piper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Chili Piper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chili Piper, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.