Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 11% → 13%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 of 67, unchanged
1 category · RankedKoalendar
31Judge labels
12First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in Interview scheduling for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Koalendar →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 69
14%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 75
6%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise55 of 75
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Koalendar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 6% | 7 of 75 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 11% → 5%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Koalendar held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 11% → 5%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 → 7 of 73
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 53 of 72, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 11% | 5% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 11% → 5%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 7 of 75 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Koalendar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Koalendar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels10
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“It's the top pick for simple automated interview scheduling, especially for small and mid-sized recruiting teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Koalendar or Calendly's free plan to get basic functionality without cost.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“Cal.com free tier or Koalendar free forever give the most features without cost” Muse Glimmer 30B · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: Koalendar (Free Forever Plan)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Koalendar, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Koalendar was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Koalendar, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Koalendar was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Koalendar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Koalendar and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
koalendar.comYour site25
firsthr.app20
lever.co19
sapia.ai19
cal.com16
hiretruffle.com15
metaview.ai15
bizbot.com14
intervue.io12
selectsoftwarereviews.com12
142 of the 167 domain citations in answers naming Koalendar came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
koalendar.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Koalendar takes 6% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
koalendar.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Koalendar takes 6% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “interview scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “interview scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“koalendar”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 32 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,332,699 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,847 · 768 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,914
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 7 of 75 in interview scheduling
Segment leader
20%
Calendly
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 31 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 31 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on koalendar.com
3,159
subdomains included
Content
315
counted in the table below
Documentation
175
Product · Integration
7 · 37
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 134 | 17 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Comparison | 100 | 1 | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Template or tool | 42 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 15 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2026-05-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 0 | 2026-03-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Best venue scheduling software blog
- 2026-09-18Best home services scheduling software blog
- 2026-09-11Best scheduling software service business blog
- 2026-09-11Free meeting room booking system blog
- 2026-08-28Best patient scheduling software blog
- 2026-08-28How organilog made customer scheduling more reliable with koalendar blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page koalendar.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Koalendar
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Koalendar is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Koalendar is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Koalendar is an online scheduling software that helps professionals, teachers, and teams simplify appointment booking and calendar management.
- For
- professionals, teachers, and teams
- Price stated
- Free forever plan; Pro $96.99/seat/month; Pro $129/month; Business $3629/month; Enterprise custom pricing koalendar.com
- Starting price
- Free koalendar.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free forever plan; 7-day free trial; No credit card required koalendar.com
- Integrations claimed
- 16 koalendar.com · 8000 koalendar.com/pricing pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2SOC 2 Type 2 compliantGDPR compliant
- Customers named
- OrganilogOrlando House of Projectstechnology consulting firmKanataWe Are WellbeingMiners' NineVisit Las VegasMomentum College Prep
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Koalendar's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: koalendar.com, koalendar.com/pricing, trust.koalendar.com, koalendar.com/features/mobile-app, koalendar.com/blog/category/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Koalendar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Koalendar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Koalendar by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Koalendar is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Koalendar, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.