| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 21 of 75 | 21% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 29 of 108 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 21 of 75 |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 29 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“YouCanBookMe (Free Forever Plan) ... Highly flexible for custom workflows, cheap upgrades” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative
“Solo recruiter/very small team: Start with Calendly Free or YouCanBookMe Free” Kimi K2 · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative
“It is highly praised by recruiters for its custom email/SMS reminder flows.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative
“Best cheap paid option: YouCanBook.me at about $9/month” Perplexity Sonar · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Popular but Less Ideal for Scale: Calendly/YouCanBookMe/SavvyCal shine for sales/demos but lack recruiting-specific ATS sync and panel depth” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · scale prompt · soft negative
“they struggle when you need to coordinate multiple interviewers across time zones” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“They fail at "panel" loops” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 43 answers that named YouCanBookMe and are not a share of its labels.
174 of the 198 domain citations in answers naming YouCanBookMe came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 359 | 10 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Comparison | 32 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 26 | 0 | 2025-10-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 2 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Case study | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2022-06-24 |
Every page youcanbook.me exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What YouCanBookMe's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: youcanbook.me, youcanbook.me/pricing, youcanbook.me/security, youcanbook.me/feature/sms, youcanbook.me/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when YouCanBookMe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as YouCanBookMe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for YouCanBookMe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: