Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 → 20 of 67
2 categories · RankedMicrosoft Bookings
44Judge labels
3First choices
10Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Interview scheduling for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 75 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business21 of 69
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market11 of 75
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise7 of 75
4%9 labels
under the label threshold
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Microsoft Bookings for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 2% | 11 of 75 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 27 of 108 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Microsoft Bookings held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 11 of 73
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 43 → 7 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 11 of 75 |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 35 → 27 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Bookings across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Bookings across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative22 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Microsoft Bookings or Google Calendar will be the most cost-effective solutions if you’re already using their respective ecosystems.” Mistral Small · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Bookings is ideal for teams already in the Microsoft ecosystem.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you already use Microsoft 365/Outlook, it's effectively free/included.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative
“Businesses already using Microsoft 365, Outlook, and Teams” GPT-6 Luna · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Bookings, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Bookings was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Bookings, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Bookings was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Bookings. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 44 answers that named Microsoft Bookings and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cal.com26
lever.co22
firsthr.app20
intervue.io20
calendly.com18
koalendar.com17
metaview.ai16
agiled.app15
sapia.ai15
hiretruffle.com14
183 of the 183 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Bookings came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
microsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Microsoft Bookings takes 2% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
microsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Microsoft Bookings takes 2% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “interview scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “interview scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 27,100 a month (“microsoft bookings”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,496 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 145,358,109 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,421,769 · 793,520 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,904,433
- Paid Google search
- 56 searches its ads show for, about 705 clicks and $12,455 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 75 in interview scheduling
Segment leader
20%
Calendly
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 44 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 43 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on microsoft.com
10,448
subdomains included
Content
146
counted in the table below
Documentation
10
Product · Integration
1,142 · 20
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 44 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 30 | undated | |||
| News or press | 27 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 25 | 4 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 12 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-12-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28At nasa ai is helping scientists unlock discoveries hidden in decades of data news or press
- 2026-09-24Rockwell automation pairs ai with decades of shop floor know how so workers can solve glitches faster news or press
- 2026-09-24Run assert eval responsible ai agent risk discovery at runtime blog
- 2026-09-23On the issues blog
- 2026-09-22When disaster strikes ai helps responders reach people more quickly news or press
- 2026-09-21Microsoft datacenter academy helps launch tech careers news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page microsoft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Microsoft Bookings
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Microsoft Bookings is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Microsoft Bookings is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Free plan or trial
- Vyzkoušet zdarma microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview
- Customers named
- ContentsquareServiceNowPangaea DataNeo4jSoftwareOnePresidio
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Microsoft Bookings's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview, trust.microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/solutions/ai, microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Bookings's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Bookings, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Bookings by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Microsoft Bookings is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Bookings, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.