AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › ThoughtSpot · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ThoughtSpot

8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ThoughtSpot was named 3 times in People analytics, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ThoughtSpot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
People analyticsWorkforce planning and analytics0%29 of 1140%3under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, ThoughtSpot held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · People analytics · by segment

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 29 → 26 of 101
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 18 of 72, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
People analytics0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 29 of 114, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ThoughtSpot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Organizations wanting AI-driven analytics across business functions” MiniMax M2.5 · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
“AI-assisted insights and natural language: ThoughtSpot.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ThoughtSpot, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThoughtSpot was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Visier7 of 86Not among the top eight
Workday People Analytics6 of 80Not among the top eight
Crunchr4 of 81Not among the top eight
BambooHR3 of 80Not among the top eight
ChartHop3 of 80Not among the top eight
Eletive2 of 80Not among the top eight
Microsoft Viva Insights2 of 80Not among the top eight
One Model2 of 80Not among the top eight
Orgvue2 of 80Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics2 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ThoughtSpot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named ThoughtSpot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thoughtspot.comYour site8
eletive.com5
workhuman.com5
gartner.com4
learn.g2.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
zendikt.com4
currentware.com3
cxtoday.com3
dupple.com3

Thirty-five of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming ThoughtSpot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

thoughtspot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ThoughtSpot takes 0% of first choices and Crunchr takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “people analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “people analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
8,100 a month (“thoughtspot”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
269 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 207,491 a month
Searches its site ranks for
14,489 · 1,192 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,441
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 61 clicks and $2,050 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 64 text, 48 image, 8 video · 75 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2023, as ThoughtSpot, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 114 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 114 in people analytics
Segment leader
22%
Crunchr
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
8 answers
Its own site cited
in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on thoughtspot.com
8,927
subdomains included
Content
913
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,304
Product · Integration
44 · 15
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog32712026-09-24
Report or ebook181undated
News or press178undated
Comparison8802026-02-20
Glossary or explainer7242026-09-22
Case study3702016-11-11
Conference or event1202026-06-11
Webinar or virtual event11undated
Podcast or video642026-09-29
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on thoughtspot.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page thoughtspot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as ThoughtSpot

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ThoughtSpot; a claim can dispute any of them.
ThoughtSpot (HR Analytics) 1

Follow ThoughtSpot

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ThoughtSpot is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Agentic Analytics platform that turns insights into action with AI agents, automated insights, and embedded intelligence.
For
Business Leaders; Data Leaders & Analysts; Product Teams & Developers
Price stated
Starting as low as $25 per user / per month (billed annually); Starting as low as $0.10 Per credit; Custom pricing tailored to your teams, data, and deployment needs.; Free for 1 year; Flexible pricing models aligned with your use case & GTM requirements.; Free thoughtspot.com/pricing
Starting price
25 thoughtspot.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free trial thoughtspot.com
Integrations claimed
6 thoughtspot.com
Certifications
SOC1SOC2SOC3ISO 27001CSA StarHIPPAGDPREU-US DPF
Customers named
ZencargoBramblesMidas PharmaBooking.comSephoraCarTrawlerHPAustin Capital Bank
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What ThoughtSpot's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: thoughtspot.com, thoughtspot.com/pricing, trust.thoughtspot.com, thoughtspot.com/product/model, thoughtspot.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ThoughtSpot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ThoughtSpot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ThoughtSpot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ThoughtSpot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ThoughtSpot, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thoughtspot.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.