Every category where a model named Visier for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee monitoring	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	17 of 75	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33%
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	12 of 98	10%	20	accepted challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	21 of 114	41%	46	criticized challenger	▼−11Since September 2026: 11% → 0%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	21 of 90	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	0%	48 of 73	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 12%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HR AI assistants	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	89 of 142	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	81 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	87 of 127	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Visier yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Visier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	2	0	5
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	4	0	2	7
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	0	2	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	0	3	7
Mistral Small	1	2	5	2	10
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	2	2	8
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	3	2	4	10
Kimi K2	1	1	2	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	1	2	5
GPT-6 Luna	1	4	0	0	5
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	3	1	2	7

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct48 labels11

Paraphrase36 labels18

Comparative70 labels27not counted in share

Budget-constrained36 labels4

Scale-constrained39 labels4

Negative46 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative275 labels in all, every segment counted; 37 of the 68 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Visier – Best for workforce data analytics / enterprise workforce intelligence Dedicated people analytics platform aggregating HR data across multiple sources” Muse Glimmer 30B · People analytics · comparative prompt · first choice

“Look for platforms that aggregate at the team or company level (like Visier, Crunchr, or Personio for EU companies)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · first choice

“Best for: Enterprise organizations seeking deep workforce intelligence ... comprehensive workforce intelligence (Visier)” MiniMax M2.5 · People analytics · comparative prompt · first choice

“Visier — The Enterprise Leader ... Built the enterprise people analytics category; deepest workforce intelligence” Kimi K2 · People analytics · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“"Avoid or be cautious about: Enterprise-grade dedicated people-analytics platforms (Visier, Workday People Analytics, One Model, ChartHop, Crunchr...)"” Muse Glimmer 30B · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative

“avoid enterprise-focused tools like Visier, Workday, One Model, ChartHop, Crunchr, Eletive, Workhuman iQ, and Microsoft Viva Glint” Mistral Small · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative

“some models recommend avoiding Visier if your team lacks IT/data capacity” Llama 4 Maverick · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative

“Enterprise tools like Visier/Crunchr (~$50K+/yr) aren't budget-friendly.” Grok 4.1 Fast · People analytics · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Visier, over the 275 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visier was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartHop120 of 27529Not among the top eight

Workday People Analytics86 of 2752Not among the top eight

One Model81 of 2750Not among the top eight

Crunchr79 of 27510Not among the top eight

Rippling71 of 27510Not among the top eight

BambooHR63 of 27523Not among the top eight

Anaplan52 of 27517Not among the top eight

Workday Adaptive Planning48 of 27511Not among the top eight

Lattice43 of 2751Not among the top eight

HiBob40 of 2756Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visier. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 259 of the 275 answers that named Visier and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com113

workhuman.com81

learn.g2.com77

firsthr.app75

guideflow.com69

hibob.com66

ordio.com63

g2.com61

hr.university60

eletive.com54

719 of the 719 domain citations in answers naming Visier came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

workhuman.com/blog/people-analytics-software76

ordio.com/en/insights/guides/hr-analytics-software61

hr.university/tools/hr-analytics-software59

eletive.com/blog/people-analytics-tools54

hibob.com/blog/best-hr-analytics-software-tools50

learn.g2.com/best-hr-analytics-software44

thrivesparrow.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software43

dupple.com/learn/best-hr-analytics-software42

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

visier.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Visier takes 2% of first choices and ActivTrak takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee monitoring tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee monitoring tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 2,400 a month (“visier”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 72 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 40,267 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,617 · 433 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 5,264
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

17+ ads · 17 text · 16 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2024, as Visier Solutions Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 12 in the year, 5 before. 103 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 17 of 75 in employee monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ActivTrak

First choices: 37 across its categories
Named in: 275 answers
Its own site cited: in 259 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on visier.com

1,648

subdomains included

Content

1,155

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

71 · 25

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	804	20	2026-09-25
News or press	247	undated
Case study	46	0	2022-10-04
Conference or event	23	undated
Glossary or explainer	22	2	2026-09-15
Comparison	5	0	2025-03-13
Report or ebook	3	undated
Podcast or video	3	0	2024-01-31
Template or tool	2	0	2020-04-16

Most recent

2026-09-25Employee retention strategies blog
2026-09-22Ai in the workplace new research on performative ai blog
2026-09-15What is workforce context glossary or explainer
2026-09-15Non negotiables ai ready workforce data blog
2026-09-08Outsmarting the status quo blog
2026-09-03Contextual ai analytics assistant announcement blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

April 28, 2026Outsmart conferencePalm Springs · took part
April 22, 2026 to April 24, 2026Outsmart 2026Palm Springs · hosted

As the event pages on visier.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page visier.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Visier

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Visier; a claim can dispute any of them.

Visier (Visier People) 1Visier People 1

Follow Visier

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Visier is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Visier Workforce AI is the context foundation for talent management.
visier.com
For: CHROs & Talent Leaders; People Leaders & Managers; HR IT & CIOs; People Analytics; Finance
visier.com
Free plan or trial: Free Trial: Visier People visier.com
Integrations claimed: 20 visier.com
Certifications: SOC 2GDPRCCPA
Customers named: ProvidenceSunstate EquipmentMcKessonPTCPrintpackProtective Life CorporationTelusKong
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, hosting

What Visier's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: visier.com, trust.visier.com, visier.com/platform, visier.com/customers, visier.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Visier by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Visier is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Visier, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.