Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 90 → 73 of 77
3 categories · RankedEletive
30Judge labels
0First choices
14Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in People analytics for small business buyers
Rank 91 of 114 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 44% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business77 of 81
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market91 of 114
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise26 of 79
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Eletive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 91 of 114 | 44% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee engagement surveys | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 25 of 58 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 41 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Eletive held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 → 38 of 101
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 26 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 91 of 114 |
| Employee engagement surv | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 58, unchanged |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Eletive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Eletive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for mid-market teams wanting simple, fast people reporting within their HRIS” Mistral Small · People analytics · direct prompt · alternative
“If you need an all-in-one solution, consider Leapsome or Eletive” Mistral Small · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative
“Fast reporting & attrition signals | Lightweight, HRIS-integrated” Grok 4.1 Fast · People analytics · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: Continuous employee engagement and follow-through.” Mistral Small · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Avoid or be cautious about: Enterprise-grade dedicated people-analytics platforms (... Eletive, Workhuman iQ, Microsoft Viva Glint)"” Muse Glimmer 30B · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-focused tools like ... Eletive” Mistral Small · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“may not be suitable for small businesses due to their high costs and complex setups” Llama 4 Maverick · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“Eletive is described as `Not suitable for small companies under 100 employees`” Muse Glimmer 30B · People analytics · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Eletive, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eletive was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Eletive, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eletive was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eletive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Eletive and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
eletive.comYour site25
workhuman.com17
ordio.com15
hrbench.com14
thrivesparrow.com13
hr-ai-index.com12
peoplemanagingpeople.com12
firsthr.app10
hibob.com10
effy.ai9
112 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming Eletive came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
eletive.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Eletive takes 0% of first choices and Crunchr takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
eletive.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Eletive takes 0% of first choices and Crunchr takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “people analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “people analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“eletive”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 35 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,364 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,328 · 91 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 617
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 91 of 114 in people analytics
Segment leader
22%
Crunchr
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on eletive.com
2,059
subdomains included
Content
509
counted in the table below
Documentation
237
Product · Integration
158 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 273 | undated | Performance management, 360 feedback | ||
| Case study | 87 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 69 | undated | Employee engagement surv | ||
| Conference or event | 59 | 1 | 2026-09-30 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-302026 conference or event
- 2026-09-24Workforce management better employee experience webinar or virtual event
- 2026-03-172026 conference or event
- 2025-10-152025 conference or event
- 2025-04-232025 conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page eletive.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Eletive
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Eletive is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Eletive is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The People Success Platform; The modern Employee Engagement Platform; Increase engagement & performance with AI-powered people intelligence
- For
- HR professionals and people leaders
- Price stated
- Pricing eletive.com/features
- Free plan or trial
- free demo eletive.com/pricing
- Certifications
- Eletive Certification
- Customers named
- AkzoNobelPurmoDoleXella GroupMölnlyckeOras GroupMestergruppenPollmann International
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Eletive's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: eletive.com, eletive.com/pricing, eletive.com/features, eletive.com/customers/customer-stories, eletive.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eletive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eletive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Eletive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Eletive is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Eletive, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.