Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 92 → 75 of 77
1 category · RankedOne Model
82Judge labels
1First choices
28Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in People analytics for enterprise buyers
Rank 22 of 114 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of One Model →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business79 of 81
0%20 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market22 of 114
0%20 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise5 of 79
2%36 labels
accepted challenger
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named One Model for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 22 of 114 | 25% | 20 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, One Model held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 28 → 19 of 101
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 22 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated One Model across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated One Model across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels1
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative22 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative22 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative82 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Examples with better reputations for ethical approaches include Culture Amp, Crunchr, and One Model” Kimi K2 · People analytics · negative prompt · first choice
“Visier or One Model (choose Visier for speed, One Model for maximum control)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start with Visier and One Model.” GPT-6 Luna · People analytics · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most flexible for organizations with complex data architectures and specific modeling needs” Kimi K2 · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid enterprise-focused tools like Visier, Workday, One Model, ChartHop...” Mistral Small · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Included in the "avoid or be cautious about" enterprise list above.” Muse Glimmer 30B · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Deeply customizable enterprise workbenches (e.g., *One Model*, *Visier*...) ... these tools are a trap” Gemini 3.5 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“may not be suitable for small businesses due to their high costs and complex setups” Llama 4 Maverick · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as One Model, over the 82 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and One Model was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as One Model, over the 82 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and One Model was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named One Model. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 82 answers that named One Model and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workhuman.com39
peoplemanagingpeople.com33
eletive.com31
hrbench.com31
thrivesparrow.com31
firsthr.app30
effy.ai29
hr.university29
ordio.com28
learn.g2.com25
306 of the 306 domain citations in answers naming One Model came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
onemodel.co ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, One Model takes 0% of first choices and Crunchr takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
onemodel.co ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, One Model takes 0% of first choices and Crunchr takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “people analytics platform”
2
Position for “people analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“one model”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,191 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,190 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 585 · 36 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 766
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 114 in people analytics
Segment leader
22%
Crunchr
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 82 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 80 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on onemodel.co
460
subdomains included
Content
362
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
14 · 6
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 241 | 8 | 2026-09-28 | People analytics, Workforce planning | |
| Report or ebook | 49 | undated | People analytics, Workforce planning | ||
| Conference or event | 25 | 0 | 2026-02-13 | People analytics | |
| News or press | 20 | 0 | 2026-03-12 | People analytics | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | undated | Workforce planning | ||
| Comparison | 9 | undated | Talent intelligence, People analytics | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-05-22 | People analytics | |
| Case study | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Human in the loop ai blog
- 2026-08-24Internal mobility blog
- 2026-08-20Ai changes blog
- 2026-08-04Governed data foundation ai blog
- 2026-07-21Marketing content download reporting blog
- 2026-07-21Data intelligence in action blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 19, 2026 to October 22, 2026Gartner Orlando 2026Walt Disney World Swan and Dolphin Resort, Lake Buena Vista, United States · exhibits
- October 27, 2026Join Us for the Swan StrollWalt Disney World Swan · hosts
Last twelve months
- November 17, 2025 to November 18, 2025Gartner ReimagineHR ConferenceSydney, Australia
- October 27, 2025 to October 29, 2025Gartner ReimagineHR ConferenceOrlando, USA
- October 23, 2025 to October 24, 2025SIOP Leading Edge Consortium: People AnalyticsAtlanta, USA
- October 21, 2025 to October 22, 2025Unleash WorldParis, France
- October 15, 2025 to October 16, 2025People Analytics WorldNew York City, USA
As the event pages on onemodel.co state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page onemodel.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as One Model
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as One Model; a claim can dispute any of them.
OneModel (or One Model) 1
Follow One Model
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
One Model is its own company.ShowHide
The company
One Model is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Best HR Analytics & People Analytics Software
- For
- HR teams; CHROs, HRBPs, and executives; CFO, CHRO, HRBP, HRIS, People Analytics Leader, Talent Acquisition
- Price stated
- Essentials, Data Mesh, Enterprise onemodel.co/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 6 onemodel.co/security
- Certifications
- ISO certifiedISO 27001:2022SOC 2 Type II
- Customers named
- ParamountJLLInstacart
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What One Model's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: onemodel.co, onemodel.co/pricing, onemodel.co/security, onemodel.co/products/one-ai, onemodel.co/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when One Model's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as One Model, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for One Model by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where One Model is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name One Model, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.