Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 100 → 91 of 99
3 categories · RankedOrgvue
91Judge labels
14First choices
14Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in Org charts for enterprise buyers
Rank 34 of 98 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 36% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Orgvue →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business93 of 102
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market34 of 98
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise12 of 83
0%20 labels
accepted challenger
In workforce planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Orgvue for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 34 of 98 | 36% | 11 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 19 of 95 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 26 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Orgvue held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce planning · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 18 → 88 of 93
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 11 of 68, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 19 of 95 |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 34 of 98 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 26 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Orgvue across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Orgvue across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels3
Paraphrase21 labels10
Comparative28 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative15 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative91 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Model major reorganizations, visualize spans & layers, or navigate an M&A. | Large Enterprise | Orgvue” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“Redesigning the organization or planning skills and roles years ahead? Start with Orgvue.” GPT-6 Luna · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“For org design and workforce planning with scenario modeling: Orgvue.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · comparative prompt · first choice
“consider HR-based tools like ChartHop, Orgvue, or Nakisa” Mistral Small · Org charts · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid jumping straight to enterprise platforms like ... Orgvue” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“expensive and complex” Kimi K2 · Workforce planning · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Orgvue's advanced features come with a steep learning curve, handling large datasets can cause lag or freezing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excellent but often priced for larger enterprises; may be overkill and over-budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Orgvue, over the 91 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orgvue was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Orgvue, over the 91 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orgvue was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Orgvue. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 91 answers that named Orgvue and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com31
worldmetrics.org31
guideflow.com29
onedirectory.com28
peoplemanagingpeople.com28
orgvue.comYour site26
gitnux.org21
intervue.io19
creately.com18
firsthr.app17
222 of the 248 domain citations in answers naming Orgvue came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
orgvue.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Orgvue takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
orgvue.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Orgvue takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workforce planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workforce planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“orgvue”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 20,029 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,909 · 346 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,417
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 609 clicks and $9,026 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 98 in workforce planning
Segment leader
37%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 14 across its categories
- Named in
- 91 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 90 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on orgvue.com
531
subdomains included
Content
410
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
40 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 192 | undated | Workforce planning, People analytics | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 48 | undated | Workforce planning, Succession planning | ||
| Podcast or video | 46 | undated | Workforce planning, Succession planning | ||
| Report or ebook | 42 | undated | Workforce planning | ||
| News or press | 38 | undated | Workforce planning | ||
| Case study | 37 | undated | Workforce planning, People analytics | ||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | Workforce planning, People analytics |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page orgvue.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Orgvue
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Orgvue; a claim can dispute any of them.
OrgVue 4OrgChart / Orgvue 1
Follow Orgvue
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Orgvue is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Orgvue is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The strategic platform for workforce transformation
- For
- global enterprises
- Certifications
- BSI ISO 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System Certified badgeISO/IEC 42001 certificationSOC 2ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27018:2019ISO/IEC 42001:2023ISO 14001:2015TX-RAMP
- Hosting
- Orgvue North AmericaOrgvue EuropeOrgvue Asia Pacific
- Customers named
- DanoneTVHBDOSalesforceAviva plcBank of IrelandBrightstar LotteryDow
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Orgvue's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: orgvue.com, trust.orgvue.com, orgvue.com/solutions/hr, orgvue.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Orgvue's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Orgvue, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Orgvue by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Orgvue is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Orgvue, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.