Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 76 of 77
Workday · 2 categories · RankedWorkday People Analytics
100Judge labels
5First choices
42Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in People analytics for enterprise buyers
Rank 101 of 114 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 44% of its 34 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Workday People Analytics →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business80 of 81
0%19 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market101 of 114
0%34 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 79
11%44 labels
accepted challenger
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday People Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 101 of 114 | 44% | 34 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 51 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday People Analytics held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 84 → 97 of 101
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 of 72, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 84 → 101 of 114 |
| Employee monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 75, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday People Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday People Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labelsNone
Paraphrase21 labels3
Comparative26 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels2
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative26 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative100 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“It’s a natural first look for Workday customers; assess carefully if your main need is analytics across a broad, mixed tech stack.” GPT-6 Luna · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
“HRIS-embedded analytics (Workday, BambooHR, Rippling) \u2014 ... their built-in analytics may be sufficient” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · scale prompt · alternative
“Already on Workday and want embedded analytics? → Workday People Analytics / Prism” GPT-5.4 mini · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
“Global enterprises often shortlist Visier or Workday People Analytics.” Muse Glimmer 30B · People analytics · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“listed as a criticized challenger alongside Visier ... "Limited outside the Workday ecosystem" and "Premium pricing"” Muse Glimmer 30B · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Notorious for complex setups and high costs, frequently cited as a poor first choice for small teams.” Mistral Small · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Workday is notorious for complex setups and high costs” Llama 4 Maverick · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Lock-in: Many of these platforms (like Workday) lock you into their ecosystem, making it difficult to export data if you leave.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday People Analytics, over the 100 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday People Analytics was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday People Analytics, over the 100 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday People Analytics was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday People Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 95 of the 100 answers that named Workday People Analytics and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workhuman.com50
ordio.com38
hr.university36
eletive.com35
peoplemanagingpeople.com32
hrbench.com30
hibob.com29
learn.g2.com29
thrivesparrow.com29
visier.com28
336 of the 336 domain citations in answers naming Workday People Analytics came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Workday People Analytics stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Workday People Analytics stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“workday people analytics”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Workday's site (workday.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 101 of 114 in people analytics
Segment leader
22%
Crunchr
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 100 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 95 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Workday People Analytics
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday People Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday 12Workday People Analytics (Skills Cloud) 1Workday People Analytics / Prism 1Workday People Analytics / Workday Prism Analytics 1
Follow Workday People Analytics
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday People Analytics.ShowHide
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday People Analytics.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Workday People Analytics surveille les données relatives aux effectifs pour faire émerger des tendances, des risques et des opportunités cachés. Ces insights sont hiérarchisés selon leur importance, en mettant en lumière les leviers d'action et les causes profondes.
- For
- HR-Führungskräfte
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Workday People Analytics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/fr-fr/topics/hr/hr-analytics.html, workday.com/de-de/topics/hr/hr-analytics.html, workday.com/en-gb/topics/hr/hr-analytics.html, workday.com/ja-jp/topics/hr/hr-analytics.html, workday.com/en-us/topics/hr/hr-analytics.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday People Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday People Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday People Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday People Analytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday People Analytics, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.