Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 37% → 30%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
30%from 37% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 1 of 58, unchanged
1 category · RankedTability
100Judge labels
32First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
30% in Goals and OKRs for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 68 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
7 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 32 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Tability →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 63
30%50 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market2 of 68
22%32 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 61
6%18 labels
criticized challenger
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tability for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 22% | 2 of 68 | 0% | 32 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 29% → 24%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tability held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 29% → 24%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
24%from 29% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 62, unchanged
Enterprise▼−1Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 29% | 24% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 29% → 24%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 68 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tability across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tability across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct26 labels16
Paraphrase10 labels6
Comparative22 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels6
Scale-constrained10 labels4
Negative14 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative100 labels in all, every segment counted; 32 of the 47 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tability: Highly focused on simplicity, fast check-ins, and actionable tracking without enterprise bloat. Excellent automation and AI capabilities” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · scale prompt · first choice
“AI goal drafting/insights, async check-ins, dashboards out-of-box, agentic OKRs. Simple UI, strong Slack/Teams. Tops benchmarks (4.5-4.7/5).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: Tability ... start with Tability — it offers the best balance of simplicity, reporting power, and scalability at a fair price” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want a single default recommendation, Tability looks like the best fit for most mid-market B2B teams” Perplexity Sonar · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tability, over the 100 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tability was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tability, over the 100 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tability was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tability. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 99 of the 100 answers that named Tability and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tability.ioYour site93
okrstool.com78
mooncamp.com63
guideflow.com46
peoplemanagingpeople.com43
profit.co42
resources.rework.com40
ones.com35
synergita.com30
workboard.com28
405 of the 498 domain citations in answers naming Tability came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
tability.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Tability takes 22% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
tability.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Tability takes 22% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “okr tools”
6
Position for “okr software”
6
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“tability”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 14 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 39,804 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,666 · 433 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,845
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
22%
rank 2 of 68 in goals and okrs
Segment leader
24%
Perdoo
- First choices
- 32 across its categories
- Named in
- 100 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 99 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tability.io
1,748
subdomains included
Content
842
counted in the table below
Documentation
216
Product · Integration
14 · 68
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 468 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | Goals and OKRs, Performance management | |
| Comparison | 339 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | Goals and OKRs, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Case study | 9 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | undated | Performance management | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17Build and track your 90 day strategy report or ebook
- 2026-09-15Best okr software for enterprise blog
- 2026-09-15Methodology comparison
- 2026-05-20Best goal management software blog
- 2026-01-12Jannounce pricing changes blog
- 2025-12-18Tability 2025 year in review blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tability.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Tability
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tability is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tability is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- OKRs that don't suck
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Tability starts at $6/user/month with no hidden fees. tability.io
- Starting price
- $6/user/month tability.io
- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial · No credit card required · Up and running today tability.io
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPR
- Hosting
- USEUAUAustralia
- Customers named
- RebillBlacknova.vchipagesHuzzleLoqboxBlysEscrowTeach for Malaysia
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Tability's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tability.io, tability.io/pricing, tability.io/features/plan, tability.io/customers, tability.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tability's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tability, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tability by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tability is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tability, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Tability is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Tability is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideTability is among the products AI models recommend first in Goals and OKRs this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.