Small business▼−13Since September 2026: 17% → 4%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 0 pointsRank 2 → 7 of 58
1 category · RankedOKRs Tool
57Judge labels
15First choices
10Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Goals and OKRs for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 68 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of OKRs Tool →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 63
4%25 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 68
11%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 61
13%15 labels
criticized challenger
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named OKRs Tool for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 11% | 4 of 68 | 13% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, OKRs Tool held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 of 62, unchanged
Enterprise▲+9Since September 2026: 4% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 9% | 13% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 68, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated OKRs Tool across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated OKRs Tool across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained26 labels15
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best OKR software for a company with a limited budget is OKRs Tool, which is a flat-fee OKR platform that is ideal for budget-conscious teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice
“OKRs Tool\u2019s flat $49/month rate is likely the best value compared to Weekdone\u2019s per-user cost” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice
“OKRs Tool or Perdoo offer the strongest combination of features, affordability, and scalability.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice
“Oboard and OKRSTOOL appear to be the top choices, with OKRSTOOL offering a free tier” Mistral Small · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“OKRs Tool (very young vendor, no certifications, built on unproven tech)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative
“Niche or limited tools (e.g., some like OKRsTool or smaller ones): Steep learning curves, busy navigation, or superficial integrations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OKRs Tool, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OKRs Tool was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OKRs Tool, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OKRs Tool was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OKRs Tool. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 57 answers that named OKRs Tool and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
okrstool.comYour site53
tability.io50
mooncamp.com39
synergita.com28
resources.rework.com24
ones.com21
profit.co21
peoplemanagingpeople.com20
guideflow.com19
workboard.com17
239 of the 292 domain citations in answers naming OKRs Tool came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
okrstool.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OKRs Tool takes 11% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
okrstool.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OKRs Tool takes 11% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “okr tools”
1
Position for “okr software”
2
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“okrs tool”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 20 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,738 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,407 · 116 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 511
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
11%
rank 4 of 68 in goals and okrs
Segment leader
24%
Perdoo
- First choices
- 15 across its categories
- Named in
- 57 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 57 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on okrstool.com
519
subdomains included
Content
408
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
8 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 274 | undated | Goals and OKRs, Performance management | ||
| Template or tool | 57 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 45 | undated | Goals and OKRs | ||
| Report or ebook | 28 | undated | Goals and OKRs | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | Goals and OKRs | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page okrstool.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as OKRs Tool
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OKRs Tool; a claim can dispute any of them.
OKRSTOOL 1OKRsTool 1
Follow OKRs Tool
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OKRs Tool is its own company.ShowHide
The company
OKRs Tool is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- OKR software for VPs and department heads at 50-200 person companies.
- For
- VPs and department heads at 50-200 person companies
- Price stated
- Flat pricing with no per-user fees. okrstool.com
- Starting price
- 0 okrstool.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day full-feature trial · no credit card okrstool.com
- Integrations claimed
- 10 okrstool.com/trust
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantSOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSSSOC 1SOC 3GDPRSOC 2
- Hosting
- EU data residencyAWS Ireland (eu-west-1)EUAWS Ireland
- Customers named
- Trillium Information SecurityLMI UKFirmawayPUCENextbittTinabaStiftTrillium
What OKRs Tool's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: okrstool.com, okrstool.com/pricing, okrstool.com/trust, okrstool.com/platform, okrstool.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OKRs Tool's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OKRs Tool, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OKRs Tool by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OKRs Tool is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OKRs Tool, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.