Tability vs Profit.co
Seven of fourteen models named Tability first on the direct prompt; zero named Profit.co. Tability was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Profit.co by thirteen and Tability carries 32 labels and Profit.co 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
TabilityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProfit.co
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Tability and Profit.co were named in the same answer fifty-four times, of the 100 answers naming Tability and the 118 naming Profit.co. In those answers Profit.co took the first choice seven times and Tability twenty-four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Tability Profit.co first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tability on the left and Profit.co on the right.The direct prompt
Tability first, Profit.co an alternative
7 of 14 modelsProfit.co was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Tability30%#1 of 17Profit.co9%#4 of 17Tability22%#2 of 14Profit.co7%#5 of 14Profit.co13%#3 of 13Tability6%#5 of 13What the models said about Tability
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Tability: Highly focused on simplicity, fast check-ins, and actionable tracking without enterprise bloat. Excellent automation and AI capabilities” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“AI goal drafting/insights, async check-ins, dashboards out-of-box, agentic OKRs. Simple UI, strong Slack/Teams. Tops benchmarks (4.5-4.7/5).” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: Tability ... start with Tability — it offers the best balance of simplicity, reporting power, and scalability at a fair price” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Profit.co
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“The platform feels slow, basic operations like bulk editing goals require too many clicks, the UI is cluttered” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some reviewers note a slow, cluttered UI despite robust features.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“UI can be cluttered and slower” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Profit.co if you want a dedicated OKR platform with no user limits on the free plan” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“permanently free with unlimited OKRs and users, which makes it the strongest no-cost option” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall (Free for up to 5 users): Profit.co ... Profit.co is the strongest option.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.