Small business=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 6 → 8 of 88
7 categories · RankedTeamflect
149Judge labels
24First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Succession planning for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 93 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Teamflect →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 91
7%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 93
7%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise73 of 82
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Teamflect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 7% | 4 of 93 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 5% | 6 of 85 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 4% | 7 of 102 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 2% | 11 of 73 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 2% | 9 of 68 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee engagement surveys | Onboarding and employee experience | 2% | 11 of 58 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recognition and rewards | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 19 of 98 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Teamflect held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Succession planning · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 of 87, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 62 of 71, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 6 of 85 |
| Succession planning | 6% | 8% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 93, unchanged |
| Employee engagement surv | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 11 of 58 |
| Internal talent marketpl | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 102, unchanged |
| 360 feedback | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 11 of 73 |
| Goals and OKRs | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 9 of 68 |
| Recognition and rewards | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 19 of 98 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Teamflect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Teamflect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 18 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels1
Paraphrase16 labels1
Comparative34 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained54 labels20
Scale-constrained7 labels2
Negative14 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative149 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 27 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Teamflect is worth evaluating if you already use Microsoft Teams: its Professional plan lists an internal job board at $11 per user per month” GPT-6 Luna · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually Teamflect if you're already using Microsoft Teams/Outlook, because it has a free starter plan for up to 10 users” GPT-5.4 mini · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice
“For the absolute lowest budget, Effy AI, Zoho People, Teamflect, or Leapsome's free plans are excellent starting points.” Mistral Small · Performance management · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have 10 or fewer users and want a no-cost solution: Start with Teamflect, Profit.co, or Leapsome.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Performance management · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“While not highly rated overall, some specific concerns include: Limited functionality” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Performance management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Teamflect, over the 149 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamflect was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Teamflect, over the 149 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamflect was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teamflect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 149 of the 149 answers that named Teamflect and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com72
teamflect.comYour site66
workhuman.com50
firsthr.app49
effy.ai41
engagedly.com40
capterra.com37
tability.io36
g2.com35
youtube.com35
395 of the 461 domain citations in answers naming Teamflect came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
teamflect.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Teamflect takes 7% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
teamflect.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Teamflect takes 7% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “succession planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “succession planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“teamflect”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 12 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,592 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 12,953 · 79 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 965
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess81 ads · 50 text, 18 image, 13 video · 30 shown in the last 30 days
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 4 of 93 in succession planning
Segment leader
28%
Lattice
- First choices
- 24 across its categories
- Named in
- 149 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 149 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on teamflect.com
1,218
subdomains included
Content
455
counted in the table below
Documentation
619
Product · Integration
0 · 12
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 340 | 26 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 37 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 32 | 1 | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Podcast or video | 18 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 5 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-05-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 4 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Microsoft teams hr apps blog
- 2026-09-18Disgruntled employees blog
- 2026-09-18Goal check in blog
- 2026-09-18Importance of soc2 type 2 certification blog
- 2026-09-18Intranet requirements blog
- 2026-09-18How to lead ai rollout in your organization webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page teamflect.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Teamflect
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Teamflect is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Teamflect is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Performance Management Software for Microsoft Teams; employee performance and engagement management platform, natively built for Microsoft Teams and Outlook.
- For
- Trusted by enterprises worldwide; HR teams, managers, and organizations using Microsoft Teams and Outlook.
- Price stated
- 0 to 11 USD; Enterprise custom pricing based on number of seats. Contact sales for a quote. teamflect.com
- Starting price
- 0 teamflect.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try for Free with Microsoft teamflect.com
- Integrations claimed
- 200 teamflect.com
- Certifications
- SOC 1SOC 2 Type ISOC 2 Type IIGDPR-compliantCCPA-compliantSOC 2 Type I & Type II
- Hosting
- Microsoft Azure data centers, in the same region as the rest of your Microsoft 365 environmentany Azure datacenter regionUnited StatesCanadaNetherlandsSingaporeUnited Arab Emirates
- Customers named
- Securitas EuropeIREUltimate Technologies GroupHorizon HouseWRAAAlign HCMMansfield HallFCA
What Teamflect's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: teamflect.com, teamflect.com/pricing, teamflect.com/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teamflect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teamflect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teamflect by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Teamflect is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Teamflect, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.